November 17, 2019


The truth in front of our noses: Donald Trump’s behavior is disgustingly corrupt and impeachable

DAILY NEWS

It was foolish to hope that Donald Trump would be cowed into better behavior by the start of impeachment hearings last Wednesday. His type never admits wrongdoing, never apologizes, never changes for the better. Instead, they smear their accusers, attack the witnesses, and cause as much chaos as possible to distract from the growing pile of evidence against them.
Along the way, they drag their supporters down to their level, obliging them to twist the truth and contort their morals to defend the indefensible.
Thanks to the live feed of the hearings from the Longworth House Office Building, those with strong stomachs can watch this performative debasement in real-time. Just listen to the Republican congressmen during the hearings as they reel off denials, fabrications and distractions while never attempting to refute the core of the allegations against their master.
And how could they, since Trump’s lawyers, officials and Trump himself have already admitted to it all?
There is no limit to the possible number of lies and only one truth, so it’s easy for the facts to be lost in the rising tide of falsehoods. Instead of falling into the trap of refuting every conspiracy theory and slander, the best remedy is to keep repeating the truth, as often as necessary, like taking a medicine.
So, once more for the record: Trump withheld U.S. aid to Ukraine in order to extort Ukraine’s president into helping smear Joe Biden, Trump’s political rival. That’s it. Game over. Everything else — how it served Vladimir Putin’s interests in undermining Ukraine and deflecting Russian guilt for hacking the 2016 U.S. election — no matter how damning it may be, is just treasonous icing on the impeachable cake.
The U.S. eventually released the aid, which the White House had no authority to delay, only after the whistleblower blew the whistle. This is not a defense. There’s no such thing as “attempted extortion.” The threat is the crime, regardless of whether it was successful. This wasn’t diplomatic hardball, or anything between nations. It was Trump abusing the authority of the United States to help his reelection.
This may still sound like small potatoes, even if it’s a greater offense than, say, what President Nixon did leading to his resignation over Watergate. Is it really worth impeaching a president over shaking down a country most Americans can’t find on a map?
First, finding things on a map is fine, but Trump seems to care an awful lot about Ukraine, so Americans should too. He had Rudy Giuliani running a shadow foreign office in Ukraine, one dedicated to private profit, not the national interest.
Trump’s actions are not a borderline impeachment case. They are exactly what the American Founding Fathers warned against when they debated including impeachment in the Constitution they were writing.
It’s worth reading up on the history, but the bottom line is that abuse of presidential power for personal gain and receiving benefit from foreign intervention are exactly what James Madison and George Mason were most worried about during the Constitutional Convention in 1787.»
As for using reelection as proof of innocence, Mason blew that out of the water by pointing out that this would only encourage a president to “repeat his guilt,” by abusing his powers further to guarantee his reelection.
Faced with this, Trump and his allies in Congress have declared war on the system itself, essentially saying that Trump can do whatever he likes, the law be damned. What is at stake here is also far more important than Watergate because the threat is to the rule of law, to either hold the highest office in the land accountable or to treat the president as an infallible Sun King.
Doubt everything, the Republicans are saying, except for the word of Trump. What he says is always true, even if he contradicts himself tomorrow, as he so often does. This isn’t the position of a political party, but that of a cult of fanatics bowing down to a false idol.
GOP claims that the various witnesses don’t have first-hand knowledge of Trump’s crimes and misdemeanors are a bizarre joke when the White House is blocking key figures from testifying. If I have to choose, I’ll take the word of people speaking in public under oath over those shooting from ambush, cowering and tweeting.
The GOP techniques on display are quite familiar to me, having spent so much of my life inside the propaganda bubbles of the Soviet Union and Putin’s Russia. It was therefore ironic to see the GOP accusing the Democrats of "Soviet-style” hearings when it’s the Republicans who are taking cues from the KGB playbook.
Obscuring the truth is one objective, but the larger goal is to create so much doubt and hostility that people become exhausted and stick to one or two news sources that make them feel comfortable.
In America, that means directing Trump’s followers to Fox News, which has become bad enough to evoke memories of the Soviet Pravda (“Truth”) newspaper and nightly news where the Communist Party could do no wrong.
As the joke went, there were three TV channels in the USSR. Channel 1 was Brezhnev, Channel 2 was Brezhnev, and Channel 3 was a KGB guy warning you to stop changing channels. That’s what the Republicans are doing now in a desperate attempt to keep voters from hearing the truth. Don’t look with your eyes or listen with your ears, comrades, just turn back to Channel 1!
But even if you can fool some of the people all of the time, the relentless moving of the goalposts has to be wearing thin.
First Trump didn’t do it. Then, even if he did it, nobody can prove it. Well, you can prove it, but it’s not so bad. Okay, it’s bad, but the proof is second-hand. The goalposts shift by the hour, a moving target that cannot be hit.
Now there’s plenty of first-hand evidence even with the White House trying to stop key figures from testifying. All the Republicans have left is blind loyalty and slandering the messengers of so much bad news for the Dear Leader.
Unfortunately for Trump and the GOP, “the best defense is a good offense” applies better to chess than it does to the law. Just ask Trump’s campaign chief, Paul Manafort, or Trump’s adviser, Roger Stone, who is also off to a prison cell after being convicted on all counts on Friday.
That nearly everyone around Trump turns out to be a criminal is a coincidence nearly on the scale of how many of their crimes come back to Russian connections. It’s good to know that when you follow a false prophet, Jesus’s dictum “the truth will set you free” does not apply. Instead, the truth gets you sent to jail.
Trump’s ability to drag people down to his level of the swamp is mirrored on the international front. He attacks traditional allies while befriending thugs and autocrats. He spreads corruption, keen to make other leaders as complicit as he is in order to gain leverage over them. These are the practices Putin uses to spin his web in the free world and it’s a sad day when these same habits are preferred by the president of the United States.
The day the hearings began, Trump hosted Turkish leader Recep Erdogan at the White House, honoring the autocrat who recently began slaughtering the U.S.-allied Kurds in Northern Syria after Trump abandoned them.
“I’m a big fan of the president,” Trump said, without explanation. Two days earlier, Trump made the even more bizarre statement that Erdogan “has a great relationship with the Kurds,” which is like saying an alligator has a great relationship with baby ducks.
Just hours after several Republican senators met with Erdogan, Trump’s staunch defender Lindsey Graham blocked a Senate resolution condemning the Armenian genocide, a measure that recently passed the House by a vote of 405-11. Perhaps Graham considers it politically incorrect to condemn a past genocide when Turkey is now keen to commit another with tacit U.S. approval.
Such immoral lunacy is why impeachment is not only valid, but urgent. This is not a partisan matter, which is why the Renew Democracy Initiative recently moved to support the impeachment inquiry. The American people deserve the opportunity to pick a side between corruption and the rule of law, between democracy and autocracy, between the truth and deception. We already know which side Trump has taken in each case. Now his Republican defenders should be forced to do the same, to pick a side in full view of the voting public.
“Facts are stubborn things,” wrote John Adams. And we must be no less stubborn in defending those facts. If Trump is so infallible, he and his defenders should have no qualms about having him deliver the truth not on Twitter, not at a rally, but under oath.

November 16, 2019






David Holmes, an official in the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, arrives to give private testimony to the House Intelligence Committee. (Jahi Chikwendiu/The Post)
David Holmes, an official in the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, arrives to give private testimony to the House Intelligence Committee. (Jahi Chikwendiu/The Post)
David Holmes said he overheard a phone call between President Trump the U.S. ambassador to the European Union during which Trump pressed for updates on the Ukrainians’ willingness to investigate the former vice president and his son.
Earlier, lawmakers heard from former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, who said the color drained from her face when she read how President Trump had talked about her.

Trump confidant Stone guilty on all counts, faces up to 50 years in prison

A federal jury has convicted Roger Stone of lying to Congress and tampering with a witness about his efforts to learn about the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks' release of hacked Democratic emails in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

November 15, 2019

The Secret Reason Republicans Won’t Impeach Trump

The modern GOP is an un-American party. It is not interested in democracy; it is interested in power and it doesn’t care how it gets it.
Broadly speaking, there are two Republican defenses of Donald Trump. The first is the hard-shell, Lindsey Graham, Jim Jordan, Mark Meadows variant: This is all outrageous, and the real criminals are the Democrats and Jim Comey and the lovely Lisa Page. This defense is what drives these nutso GOP requests to have Hunter Biden appear under oath before the House, which is about as likely as the U.S. Olympic Committee hiring Jordan as its wrestling coach.


The second, soft-shell variant is one you’ve heard a thousand times: Well, what he did was bad, or a little bad, or maybe not what I would have done; but it doesn’t rise to the level of being impeachable.
This is the attempt to sound “reasonable,” far more rational than Graham, who just openly says he won’t even read the testimony transcripts. In fact, it’s not reasonable at all. In its way, it’s worse than the full Jordan, and more insidious, because in sounding reasonable on the surface it masks the cancer that is eating the Republican Party and has been, in fact, since before Donald Trump ran for president.
That cancer is that this is no longer a small-d democratic party. It’s an authoritarian party. And the seemingly reasonable, soft-shell defense of Trump is grounded in that authoritarianism



Let me explain what I mean here by starting with the question of why these Republicans say that what Trump did was bad but not impeachable. One answer is obvious: They are afraid of Trump and his voters. They fear that Trump can turn his people against them and defeat them. 
And that’s maddening to the rest of us, but it’s also in a way comforting, because it implies that once Trump is off the scene, this madness will lift and they’ll return to “normal.”
So it’s true, but it is not the only thing that’s true. They also say that everything Trump has done is unimpeachable for this far creepier and less reassuring reason: They do not want to admit that any Republican president is capable of doing anything illegal or impeachable while in office. They simply will not allow that precedent to be established.

It’s still the case that too few people understand the truth about the modern GOP. It is an un-American party. It is not interested in democracy. It is interested in power. It doesn’t care how it gets it. Twice in the last five elections, its winning presidential candidates have lost the popular vote. Suppose that had gone the other way around. Do you think the Electoral College would still exist? I can assure you it would not. They would have found a way to gut it. But because the un-democratic results in 2000 and 2016 happened to favor them—hey, the Electoral College is great! Whatever it takes.
Everything Republicans do with respect to our political processes is explained by this truth. Matt Bevin says, with zero evidence, that there were voting irregularities in Kentucky. Yes, he’s just being a Trumpy asshole on one level, but on another, he’s asserting this fundamental Republican truth of our age: Power is more important than democracy. He’ll steal it however he can, if he can get away with it.
And as I said, all this preceded Trump. All the crazy gerrymandering is about power over democracy. Remember when the state legislatures of Wisconsin and North Carolina tried to strip their governor’s office of powers during lame-duck sessions because the incoming governors were Democrats? Power over democracy—or, in that case, limiting the legitimate democratic power of the other side. And of course Merrick Garland. Power over democracy.
None of those things—and there are others, some truly Reichstag-ish ideas like ending direct popular elections of senators, which is a thing—have anything whatsoever to do with Trump. Instead, it’s the other way around. That is, conventional wisdom holds that Trump made the GOP lose its mind. The truth is the opposite: The GOP had lost its mind before Trump, which is why he was able to take it over. He was exactly what they were waiting for.
I was trying to explain all this in New York Review of Books piece in 2018, and while I consider it mildly self-indulgent to quote myself at length, I’m going to do it in this case. Yes, I wrote, the Republicans of the Bush-Cheney era were ideologically extreme; but even then, the Republican Party remained committed to the basic idea of democratic allocation of power. Since the Civil War, Democrats and Republicans have fought sometimes fiercely over their ideological goals, but they always respected the idea of limits on their power.
No one had come along to suggest that power should be unlimited. But now someone has, and we have learned something very interesting, and alarming, about these “conservatives,” both the rank and file and holders of high office: Their overwhelming commitment is not to democratic allocation of power, but to their ideological goals—the annihilation of liberalism, the restoration of a white ethno-nationalist hegemony.
A lot of them find Trump embarrassing or worse, but on this basic point, the vast majority of them agree with Trump and appreciate the way he has freed them from having to pretend. 
So of course they’re not going to admit Trump did anything impeachable. On Planet Earth, what Trump did is open-and-shut impeachable. As Republicans surely would agree if a Democratic president had done it. 
But here’s the thing—no Democratic president would hold up military aid for another country unless its president agreed to investigate his or her political opponents because Democrats, while of course not perfect people, have enough respect for the institutions of democracy that they just wouldn’t do that. Most Republicans probably wouldn’t do it either. But now that one has, it’s possible that others will, and as long as that possibility exists, Republicans have to act like it wasn’t really that bad a thing to do. A “mistake.” 
Oh, I nearly forgot: There’s defense 2-b, that it can’t be a crime if it didn’t succeed. Nikki Haley is the latest to trot this one out. This also is legally insane on its face (there are a lot of crimes in our penal code called “attempted” this or that, and they’re still crimes). But, again, it is rooted in the party’s authoritarian DNA. It’s a desperate rationale for holding on to power at all costs.
Is there some line that even Trump can’t cross, that will make Republicans say enough, and choose democracy over power? In theory, yes, but only if their backs are against the wall and the garrotes are held at their necks. Until that unlikely day, we will hear excuse after excuse.
David Frum wrote in January 2018: “If conservatives become convinced that they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.” He was late. They already had. But he was, to quote an old Frum book title, Dead Right
So when you hear someone on television say that Republicans’ posture is all about their fear of Trump, don’t buy it. It’s partly about that. But it’s also about this. If they were to acquiesce in the removal of a Republican president, they’d be placing democracy ahead of power. And this is one thing that we know they will not do.