Showing posts with label BAGHDAD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BAGHDAD. Show all posts

June 23, 2014

IRAQ: ISIS TAKES KEY BORDER CROSSING; BAGHDAD A CITY IN FEAR; IRAQI ARMY INEFFECTIVE


Reuters
The Washington Post

A key Iraqi border crossing was taken Saturday by Sunni militants, another blow against the crumbling authority of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s government. ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) fighters captured the crossing of Qaim on the border with Syria, which will not only facilitate deployments of equipment across the border but also advance their goal of erasing the border entirely in order to establish a single Islamic state.

Muntadar Naji Khalife held the Iraqi flag as Shiite men lined up in Najaf to register to fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. Credit Lynsey Addario for The New York Times        

N.Y. Times

The militants seem intent on methodically consolidating their hold on the large Sunni provinces to the west and north as the Iraqi Army’s attention is focused on securing Baghdad.


The militants already have considerable strength in Anbar Province, but it has been primarily in remote villages and towns, with the exception of Falluja, which they have also seized. Now, with the taking of the border post of Al Qaim after a three-day fight, and the nearby towns of Ana and Rawaa, they will be able to move on the road that leads to Haditha, where there is a major dam.

[If the dam and adjoining power station were destroyed, it could cripple the country's power grid and cause widespread flooding.Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2664954/Four-key-Iraqi-towns-fall-ISIS-militants-backed-Sunni-Muslim-fighters-country-teeters-brink-sectarian-conflict.html#ixzz35RJxSmKs ]




N.Y.Times
 
Behind the image of savagery that the extremists of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria present to the world, as casual executioners who kill helpless prisoners and behead even rival jihadis, lies a disciplined organization that employs social media and sophisticated financial strategies in the funding and governance of the areas it has conquered.

The insurgents seized as much as $400 million from the central bank in Mosul, said Atheel Nujaifi, the governor of Nineveh Province, and reportedly emptied the vaults in all the other banks in a city of more than one million residents.
 
In a bloody seesaw battle for control of Iraq’s biggest oil refinery at Baiji, halfway between Baghdad and Mosul, the insurgents worked with the families of employees there to broker a cease-fire — so the workers could be safely evacuated.
It was no humanitarian gesture. “They want them to run the refinery when the fighting is over.
 
Its extortion rackets in Mosul netted as much as $8 million a month, according to Gen. Mahdi Gharawi, until recently the Nineveh Province police commander, in an interview with Niqash, an Arabic-language news website. And that was even [before] the ISIS insurgents took over. Once in charge, they typically levy “taxes,” which are just as lucrative. So-called road taxes of $200 on trucks are collected all over northern Iraq to allow them safe passage. The Iraqi government claims that the insurgents are now levying a “tax” on Christians in Mosul, who were a significant minority there, to avoid being crucified.

BAGHDAD RESIDENTS
An Iraqi young boy holds a gun from the window of a vehicle carrying volunteers joining Iraqi security forces in the fight against Jihadist militants ... Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki announced the Iraqi government would arm and equip civilians who volunteer to fight, and thousands have signed up. AFP PHOTO/AHMAD AL-RUBAYE (Photo credit sh | AHMAD AL-RUBAYE via Getty Images
Associated Press:

While the Iraqi capital is not under any immediate threat of falling to the Sunni militants who have captured a wide swath of the country's north and west, battlefield setbacks and the conflict's growing sectarian slant is turning this city of 7 million into an anxiety-filled place waiting for disaster to happen.

Traffic is nowhere near its normal congestion. Many stores are shuttered and those that are open are doing little business in a city where streets empty hours before a 10 p.m. curfew kicks in. Arriving international and domestic flights are half empty, while outgoing flights to the relatively safe Kurdish cities of Irbil and Suleimaniya are booked solid through late July as those who can flee.

The number of army and police checkpoints has grown, snarling traffic. Pickup trucks loaded with Shiite militiamen roam the city, including in Sunni and mixed areas, chanting religious slogans....
----
Across the plaza, a giant screen displayed the text of June 13 edict by Iranian-born Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, Iraq's top Shiite cleric, calling on Iraqis to join the security forces to fight the Islamic State fighters, and reminding them that the insurgents have threatened to march on Shiite shrines in Baghdad, Samarra, Najaf and Karbala.
Just outside the mosque gates, Shiite clerics addressed dozens of Shiite militiamen in ski masks and combat fatigues. Though unarmed, their presence near one of Iraq's most revered Shiite shrines added to the sense of impending war — and was a reminder of the quick erosion of government authority following the security forces' humiliating defeat in the north, where Iraq's second-largest city, Mosul, fell after troops abandoned their positions and weapons.
Since then, tens of thousands of Shiite militiamen of the so-called "Peace Brigades" have staged parades in Baghdad and the predominantly Shiite south,...in Baghdad's sprawling Shiite Sadr City district, home to some 2 million Shiites,...The Peace Brigades is the latest name for the Mahdi Army, a brutal militia loyal to anti-U.S. cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, which took the lead in targeting Sunnis during the sectarian bloodletting nearly a decade ago.

The latest evidence [indicates] the Sunni-Shiite conflict carries the potential for a civil war that could herald the division of Iraq. It is a scenario that spells the most trouble for Baghdad. Baghdad's Sunnis already are terrified.

Militants from Sunni rebel group ISIS (pictured) seized four more towns in Iraq yesterday while Shiite soldiers marched through Baghdad as the country heads towards sectarian warfare (file pic)
Militants from Sunni rebel group ISIS (pictured) seized four more towns in Iraq yesterday while Shiite soldiers marched through Baghdad as the country heads towards sectarian warfare

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2664954/Four-key-Iraqi-towns-fall-ISIS-militants-backed-Sunni-Muslim-fighters-country-teeters-brink-sectarian-conflict.html#ixzz35RIHWH7o
N.Y.Times

As Iraqi Army forces try to rally on the outskirts of Baghdad after two weeks of retreat, it has become increasingly clear to Western officials that the army will continue to suffer losses in its fight with Sunni militants and will not soon retake the ground it has ceded.

Recent assessments by Western officials and military experts indicate that about a quarter of Iraq’s military forces are “combat ineffective,” its air force is minuscule, morale among troops is low and its leadership suffers from widespread corruption.
As other nations consider whether to support military action in Iraq, their decision will hinge on the quality of Iraqi forces, which have proved far more ragged than expected given years of American training.
 
The picture that emerges is of an Iraq where the lines on the map mean little. The north and west have become a haven for Sunni extremists who have largely succeeded in erasing the border between their territory in Syria and Iraq.
 
A measure of the military’s desperation is that its chief assistance now comes from hundreds of thousands of volunteers and a smaller number of highly trained militia members. For army units — and there are a number of them — that are fighting hard, often under difficult circumstances, adding volunteers who have little or no experience has been of questionable benefit. Hundreds of volunteers have been killed or wounded in ambushes on their way to the battlefield, for example. That is not true of the trained militias, which have far fewer fighters but are experienced and highly trained, mostly by the Iranians, and who augment the regular army’s morale, said commanders.
 
Western officials describe ISIS as a far tougher enemy than the one the American military faced when it was battling Al Qaeda in Iraq from 2004 through 2009. Assessments of the militants’ capabilities vary, but there is a consensus that despite their small numbers they are well equipped, trained and financed. They also appear dedicated to their cause of vanquishing the forces of the modern world and returning the territory they take to an earlier form of Islam.
 
With an estimated 10,000 fighters, ISIS has been able to seize stores of military equipment and plan small offensive missions that, when coupled with a propaganda campaign, have proved highly effective. So far the fighters seem impervious to combat losses, quickly replenishing their ranks with fighters from Syria, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Chechnya and Europe, who appear to be drawn by the successes in Iraq. They have also found recruits by freeing prisoners in brazen prison breaks.

June 14, 2014

IRAQ HEADLINES: PANIC SWEEPS BAGHDAD; Rebels Stall North of Baghdad as Residents Brace for a Siege, Shiites Flock to Join Militias

Volunteers in Baghdad gathered to form auxiliary militias to help defend the Iraqi capital. Credit Ayman Oghanna for The New York Times

PANIC SWEEPS BAGHDAD... 'Growing Desperation'... Teetering Toward Civil War... Top Cleric Urges Iraqis To Defend Country... Reports Of Executions, Rapes, Kidnappings... UN: 300,000 In Iraq Became Refugees This Week... FIRM: Obama Rules Out Ground Troops... 'Urgently' Considering Airstrikes... Decision Within Days... 'Not Solely Or Even Primarily A Military Challenge'... Iran Uneasy: Sends In Elite Units... So Alarmed It May Cooperate With Washington... Iraqis Who Fled Mosul Say They Prefer Militants To Government...     





Vehicles with people who fled Mosul lined up at the Khazer checkpoint in northern Iraq on Saturday. Credit Bryan Denton for The New York Times        

Rebels Stall North of Baghdad as Residents Brace for a Siege

N.Y. TIMES

A rebel juggernaut that captured Iraq’s second-largest city and raced nearly 200 miles south in three days, raising fears of an imminent assault on Baghdad, stalled for a second day on Saturday about 60 miles north of the capital, leaving residents bracing for a siege that so far has not happened.

While some Baghdad residents scrambled to leave, hoarded food or rushed to join auxiliary militias to defend the city, the militants of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria and their allies halted their advance within a two-hour drive, and there was no indication that they were seeking to push into Baghdad proper.
The rebel leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who had boasted that he would soon take the capital and press on to the Shiite heartland in southern Iraq, fell silent as his followers worked to consolidate their gains in predominantly Sunni parts of the country, instead of trying to fight their way through more heavily defended, Shiite-dominated areas.
 
The Iraqi authorities used the breather to recruit citizens to reinforce the country’s beleaguered military, while worried Baghdad residents began to stockpile essentials, sending prices skyrocketing on Saturday, the end of the Iraqi weekend. Cooking gas quadrupled in price, to about $20 on Saturday from about $5 on Thursday for a 35-pound container. The dollar, normally stable here, spiked about 5 percent overnight. And the price of potatoes increased sixfold, to about $4.50 a pound.
 
The Sunni extremists now hold sway across a broad swath of territory beginning about 60 miles north of the capital, and extending 220 miles north to Mosul and 200 miles west to the deserts of Anbar Province, where the insurgents have controlled the city of Falluja for the past six months.
The territory essentially reconstitutes what the American military, during its war here, called the Sunni Triangle: an area where Sunnis predominate and which provided fertile ground for the rise of the Sunni insurgency. It was also the area that cost the Americans by far the most casualties of the war.


An Iraqi Shiite cleaned weapons on Friday as he prepared to defend his Sadr City district in Baghdad in the event of an attack by Sunni militants. Credit Ahmad Al-Rubaye/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images       

 
 Shiites Flock to Join Militias
 
N.Y. TIMES

It was only three weeks ago that Mr. Maliki, given the number of seats his bloc had won, seemed to be in a strong position to secure a third term as prime minister. Yet his country now seemed in danger of slipping away from him. Sunni militants were in full control of Mosul and Tikrit, Saddam Hussein’s hometown, while the Kurds, ostensibly his allies, had taken over Kirkuk, an oil-rich city that they had long coveted.
But it was more than that, as Iraq’s millions of Shiites knew very well. The United States invasion and occupation had handed them a once in a millennium opportunity to rule. And now, in a matter of five or six years, they seemed on the verge of squandering it. The sacred Shiite shrines at Samarra, Karbala and Najaf were threatened by the militants and their leaders in the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, who had sworn to level the sites.
But the idea of bringing back Shiite militias sent a shudder through many, raising chilling memories of the sectarian war that raged in Iraq from 2005 through 2008, with torture chambers, ethnic cleansing of neighborhoods and bodies dumped in the Tigris with holes drilled in victims’ heads. Such a war, once unleashed, would be hard to quell, and Shiite leaders were well aware that the Sunni militants were willing to start one.
 
For now the Shiite militias-in-formation are maintaining that they are not anti-Sunni. But distrust, if not unspoken loathing, is apparent — a mirror image of the Sunni militants’ views of the Shiites and a disturbing omen for the days ahead.That Shiites feel they have to turn to militias to guarantee their protection is testimony to the country’s slide into chaos. The Iraqi Army, which the Americans spent around $20 billion trying to rebuild as a multi-sect, multiethnic force, has been so riven by sectarianism that it is unable or unwilling to protect Iraqi citizens and fight enemies of the Iraqi state in an evenhanded way.

June 12, 2014

I READ THE NEWS TODAY: IRAQ CRISIS / U.S. POLITICAL POLARIZATION / BERGDAHL / VET HOSP REFORM / STUDENT LOANS

x

Daily Beast

Iraq plunged into chaos Thursday as Kurdish forces seized control of the northern oil city of Kirkuk, while fighters from the terrorist group ISIS headed toward Baghdad. The armed forces quickly abandoned their posts in the north. With no government troops maintaining order, Kurdish fighters seized Kirkuk, which the semi-autonomous people view as their historical capital. After seizing Mosul and Tikrit, militants from ISIS, which has links to al Qaeda, have now advanced to within an hour of Baghdad.

Daily Mail
  • Iraq's government has indicated a willingness for the US military to conduct airstrikes against radical Islamist militants
  • Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant have taken over Iraq's second biggest city Mosul and town of Tikrit

  • Government forces have stalled the militants' advance near Samarra, a city just 110km (68 miles) north of Baghdad

  • ISIS's goal is to create a Islamic caliphate (state) - it already controls territory in eastern Syria and western/central Iraq

  • Iran has sent special forces and a unit of elite troops to Iraq to assist the Iraqi government halt the advance
  • Turkey is negotiating for the release of 80 nationals held by Islamist militants in Mosul
  • Iraqi air force is bombing insurgent positions in and around Mosul - 1.3 million citizens still remain in the city
  • Oil price hit a three-year high this morning on worries that supply could be disrupted  

  • =================================================
    DAILY BEAST:

    The number of Americans who are consistently conservative or consistently liberal has doubled over the past 20 years, Pew Research reported Thursday. Twenty-one percent are now consistent liberals or conservatives, up from 10 percent in 1994. In addition, those partisan sentiments are stronger among those who profess them. Also, the number of people in each party who view the opposing party in a negative light has more than doubled since 1994. They believe the other guy’s policies “are so misguided that they threaten the nation’s well-being.” Good luck governing.

    Charles Blow, N.Y. Times:

    This phenomenon coincides, to a certain degree, with the rise of talk radio and the stridently ideological cable news — profit-driven provocateurs whose livelihoods ride on their abilities to rouse rabble, stir passions and diabolize opponents.
    And many of their listeners, viewers and readers become the apostles of passion, enforcing rigid binary ideologies that accommodate little subtlety. Any seeming equivocation is deemed evidence of apostasy.
     
    [Obama's] presidency, in many ways, has been hamstrung by opposition. In the wake of his ascension came the rise of the Tea Party, the incredible assertion by the Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell, that conservatives’ top priority should be to keep Obama from being re-elected (that didn’t work out so well), the stunning assault on voter rights, the influx of conservative billionaires like the Koch brothers into the political arena, blatant gerrymandering after the last census and the unprecedented levels of obstruction by Republicans in Congress.
    ================================ 

    Washington Post, Paul Waldman

    Today, the Post published excerpts of Bowe Bergdahl’s journal, along with emails and other writings, giving us the most intimate, complex, and in many ways sad view we’ve yet had of the young man who had been held prisoner by the Taliban for five years.
    What the journal ultimately shows suggests that as a partisan political issue, Bergdahl’s release is likely to fade before long. The right has gotten about as much as they can out of it, and now that we know how troubled Bergdahl was before he wandered off his base, they may just let it go.
    The idea that Bergdahl wasn’t sufficiently deserving of rescue has been central to the conservative criticism of the deal to obtain his release. Even as they wildly exaggerate the danger of the five former Taliban we released (to hear Fox News tell it, you’d almost think the five not only planned and executed the September 11 attacks, they also have super-powers that will enable them to reduce our nation to ashes any day now), many on the right attacked Bergdahl and his family relentlessly, accusing him of being not just a deserter but an outright traitor. Some even mobilized a PR campaign to promote soldiers who would go in the media to criticize Bergdahl.
    But his writings, which were shared with the Post by a close friend, tell a story that doesn’t fit into the kind of box that can be easily used for partisan purposes. Among other things, we now know that Bergdahl joined the Coast Guard in 2006 and was quickly discharged for psychological reasons, though he claimed to friends that he had faked mental illness in order to get released (a claim about which they were skeptical). But it’s Bergdahl’s own words that are the most revealing:
    The 2006 discharge and a trove of Bergdahl’s writing — his handwritten journal along with essays, stories and e-mails provided to The Washington Post — paint a portrait of a deeply complicated and fragile young man who was by his own account struggling to maintain his mental stability from the start of basic training until the moment he walked off his post in eastern Afghanistan in 2009.
    “I’m worried,” he wrote in one journal entry before he deployed. “The closer I get to ship day, the calmer the voices are. I’m reverting. I’m getting colder. My feelings are being flushed with the frozen logic and the training, all the unfeeling cold judgment of the darkness.”
     =====================================
    Jeff Miller is pictured. | AP Photo
    Sponsored by Jeff Miller, the bill passes 421-0 with overwhelming bipartisan support. | AP Photo
    Washington Post, Paul Waldman

    Yesterday, the House passed a bill to reform medical services at the Department of Veterans Affairs on an unusual unanimous vote. Harry Reid indicated today that the Senate’s version of the VA bill, co-sponsored by Bernie Sanders and John McCain, will be fast-tracked and could come up for a vote in the next couple of days.
    Which means that unlike every other scandal (both real and trumped-up) that the Obama administration has confronted, this time demagoguery and feigned outrage gave way to — brace yourself — actual problem-solving. How could such a thing have happened?
    After all, Republicans have been allergic to passing legislation of any kind. This Congress is on pace to be the least productive in history, and John Boehner has said Congress “ought to be judged on how many laws that we repeal.”

    And just today, Senate Republicans successfully filibustered a bill allowing students burdened by crushing debt to refinance their loans.  So what was different about the VA that allowed for an actual reform effort to succeed (granting that it hasn’t quite succeeded yet)?

    The explanation is that as scandals go, this one just isn’t actually built to give Republicans that much mileage — unless they are willing to refuse to be part of the solution. But here is an area where that is impossible for them.
    Indeed, for Republicans, the opportunities for demagoguery on the VA scandal have turned out to be limited. Sure, there have been some over-the-top statements here and there, and we have seen some desk-pounding for the cameras at hearings. But there is a specific need that demands action — and veterans groups are paying close attention — which means blaming our Kenyan Muslim Socialist president can only go so far. Every member of Congress has to be ready to answer the question, “What are you doing to solve the problem?”, and “I’m holding Barack Obama’s feet to the fire!” isn’t an answer any constituent is going to accept.

    Beyond this is the fact that here is an area where Republicans and Democrats have fundamentally the same goal: they both want to see veterans get good health care. There are limits to their agreement — Republicans would also like to privatize the VA to whatever degree they can, just as they’d like to privatize Medicare and Medicaid. And this bill starts down that road, by allowing veterans who live more than 40 miles from a VA medical facility or who have been waiting for extended periods to take their VA coverage and get care at private providers. But unlike in previous controversies, both parties actually want to solve the problem.