Showing posts with label DE BLASIO BILL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DE BLASIO BILL. Show all posts

January 23, 2015

Sheldon Silver, Dem New York Assembly Speaker, Took Millions in Graft, U.S. Says


heldon Silver, a Democrat from the Lower East Side of Manhattan, has been the speaker of the State Assembly for more than two decades. CreditNathaniel Brooks for The New York Times


NY TIMES

Sheldon Silver, the speaker of the New York Assembly, exploited his position as one of the most powerful politicians in the state to obtain millions of dollars in bribes and kickbacks, federal authorities said on Thursday as they announced his arrest on a sweeping series of corruption charges. [See below for graphic]
For years, Mr. Silver has earned a lucrative income outside government, asserting that he was a simple personal injury lawyer who represented ordinary people. But federal prosecutors said his purported law practice was a fiction, one he created to mask about $4 million in payoffs that he carefully and stealthily engineered for over a decade.
Mr. Silver, a Democrat from the Lower East Side of Manhattan, was accused of steering real estate developers to a law firm that paid him kickbacks. He was also accused of funneling state grants to a doctor who referred asbestos claims to a second law firm that employed Mr. Silver and paid him fees for referring clients.
“For many years, New Yorkers have asked the question: How could Speaker Silver, one of the most powerful men in all of New York, earn millions of dollars in outside income without deeply compromising his ability to honestly serve his constituents?” Preet Bharara, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, asked at a news conference with F.B.I. officials. “Today, we provide the answer: He didn’t.”
The United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara, announces the charges against Sheldon Silver, the longtime Assembly speaker, who was arrested Thursday morning.
 Video by AP on Publish DateJanuary 22, 2015. Photo by Michael Appleton for The New York Times.
NY TIMES

His power unbending, his whims often unexplained, Sheldon Silver, in his two decades as speaker of the State Assembly, became a seemingly indestructible presence at the nucleus of the New York political world, a steady advocate for liberal causes and a master tactician in Albany’s closed and entrenched way of governance.
But Mr. Silver’s arrest on Thursday on corruption charges has thrown into question that arrangement, in which the governor and the leaders of the two chambers of the Legislature privately decide the most crucial policies of the state. It is a potentially seismic shift in power whose reverberations may be felt throughout the state, from the speaker’s home district on the Lower East Side of Manhattan to the grounds of the State Capitol.
Until now, Albany lawmakers accustomed to what prosecutors called a “show-me-the-money culture” have taken comfort in knowing that their most powerful figure was unassailable — untouched despite years of inquiries, suspicions and rumors of impropriety.
The events this week have shaken that sense of security and raised the possibility that Mr. Silver, the quintessential capital insider, could reveal his own colleagues’ misdeeds to federal prosecutors in exchange for leniency.
For the state’s orbit of lobbyists, advocates, elected officials and industry executives with a stake in the productivity and product of the Legislature, Mr. Silver’s potential diminution, if not exit, carries enormous consequences.
“It’s chaos,” said Richard L. Brodsky, a former Democratic assemblyman from Westchester County.
Labor unions and big industries like real estate depended on Mr. Silver to defend their interests in back-room negotiations, where he, governors and Senate leaders determined the fate of new legislation each year.
“Any interest group whose political strategy depends on the strength of the Assembly, they have to be concerned,” said Blair Horner, the legislative director for the New York Public Interest Research Group.
Recently, Mr. Silver has emerged as an important adviser to Mayor Bill de Blasio.CreditNathaniel Brooks for The New York Times

Mr. Silver has long been the key representative of New York City in a legislative body that could be notoriously unfriendly to the city’s interests. Recently, he also emerged as an important adviser to Mayor Bill de Blasio, who may now be forced to navigate Albany’s machinery without a like-minded friend in the negotiating room.
Questions were already being raised on Thursday about Mr. de Blasio’s legislative agenda, which includes immigration reform efforts backed by Mr. Silver. Mr. de Blasio spearheaded a campaign last year to unseat the Republican majority in the State Senate; that effort fell short, and Dean G. Skelos, a Long Island Republican who is the Senate majority leader, has signaled that he is disinclined to aid the mayor.
Mr. de Blasio, who had a win-a-few, lose-a-few legislative session last year, is also wary of Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo’s efforts to expand charter schools and weaken teachers’ unions. Mr. Silver was a bulwark against those efforts, and a waning of his influence could hurt the mayor’s leverage.
Mr. Cuomo, for his part, may also need to recalculate rapidly. Before Mr. Silver was taken into custody, Mr. Cuomo, a fellow Democrat, unreeled an ambitious social justice agenda in his State of the State address, a headline-grabbing turn for a governor who prides himself on centrism.
It was a signal moment for Mr. Cuomo, who was embracing the start of a new four-year term and eager to put the troubles of last year, including a bumpy re-election campaign and a string of ethics concerns, behind him.
Instead, the speech was mostly forgotten by Thursday morning, with Mr. Silver’s arrest plunging the governor back into the ethical morass from which he had hoped to escape.
Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, shown on March 20, announced the demise of his ethics commission on Saturday with little fanfare. CreditMike Groll/Associated Press

N.Y. TIMES

Sheldon Silver, the speaker of the New York Assembly and one of the most powerful politicians in Albany, did all he could to derail and undermine ananticorruption panel established by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo.
With his arrest on federal corruption charges on Thursday, there may now be an answer to the question of why.
Investigators from the panel, which was known as the Moreland Commission, were seeking records about Mr. Silver’s sources of income outside of his work as a lawmaker — the same sources of income that would form the basis of the case brought against Mr. Silver by the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York.
Even before Mr. Cuomo abruptly shut down the commission in March — and before it became clear that the governor himself had interfered with its investigations — Mr. Silver, who like the governor is a Democrat, attacked the work it was doing.
“The commission, we believe, has exceeded its mandate and has been engaged in a fishing expedition to intimidate legislators,” Mr. Silver told reporters in February.



N.Y. TIMES

Al Smith, the storied governor of New York in the 1920s who laid the groundwork for the New Deal, has been credited with making a famously cynical remark as he walked through a law school library. He spotted a student, bent over books and reading.
“There,” Smith supposedly said, “is a young man studying how to take a bribe and call it a fee.”
On Thursday, we learned that federal prosecutors believe that Sheldon Silver, the speaker of the New York State Assembly, collected $4 million in payments from two law firms for essentially no legal work.
The prosecutors have said that these were nothing but bribes, dolled up with feathers, wigs and lipstick to make them look like legal fees. 

Prosecutors said a doctor at a university hospital in New York City began sending lung patients to a law firm associated with Mr. Silver for possible civil suits over asbestos exposure. Two months later, Mr. Silver invited the doctor to apply for state grants that he controlled. The doctor got $500,000 for a research center on lung disease. And Mr. Silver — who did no legal work whatsoever on the asbestos cases — got referral fees for the suits amounting to more than $3 million, according to a criminal complaint made public on Thursday.
In his official communications, Mr. Silver said the grant money would support research on Sept. 11 illnesses. He told the doctor not to tell a mutual friend that he was sending cases to Mr. Silver’s firm, the complaint said.
For years, Mr. Silver proclaimed himself a champion of disclosure. Somehow, the Assembly never got around to passing rules that would have revealed the relationships now laid bare. Asked by an investigating commission for “a description of the services you provide or have provided in exchange for compensation,” Mr. Silver did not answer the straightforward question. Instead, the Assembly hired a law firm to fight the subpoena. The panel, known as the Moreland Commission, “was engaged in a fishing expedition to intimidate legislators,” Mr. Silver said. It was disbanded by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo.
So the commission never found out that Mr. Silver had allegedly been secretly paid a total of $685,513.63 in “referral fees” by a two-person law firm that specialized in an arcane area of law. Nor did the commission learn, as the prosecutors say they did, that Mr. Silver got the referral money after he sent two big real estate developers to the little law firm — developers who needed legislative favors from Mr. Silver.
For years, there was mystery about what exactly Mr. Silver did to earn so much from his main source of income, the law firm Weitz & Luxenberg, which handled the asbestos cases. A grand jury subpoena asked.
“That request resulted in production of records related to a single property dispute in which Silver, along with other Weitz & Luxenberg attorneys, represented an individual,” according to the complaint.



August 6, 2013

De Blasio Asks City to Address Its Inequalities


Bill de Blasio, left, at Memorial Baptist Church in Harlem with his wife, Chirlane McCray, and State Senator Bill Perkins

N.Y. TIMES

In a mayor’s race crammed with celebrity razzle-dazzle, historic candidacies and tabloid turns, a gangly liberal from Brooklyn is quietly surging into the top tier of the field by talking about decidedly unglamorous topics: neglected hospitals, a swelling poverty rate and a broken prekindergarten system.

Despite his left-leaning politics, Mr. de Blasio wants to become the candidate of the overlooked outer boroughs. His campaign is a frontal assault on the Bloomberg era — as being unfair, undemocratic and unfeeling. But his sharp critique of the mayor also doubles as an attack on Ms. Quinn, Mr. Bloomberg’s partner in government and Mr. de Blasio’s chief rival for the liberal white vote. For him to succeed, she must fail. Watch for him to portray her as an unprincipled Bloomberg-lite.

Now that Anthony D. Weiner’s campaign has imploded, Bill de Blasio, the public advocate, is drawing new energy and voter interest to a candidacy that presents the most sweeping rejection of what New York City has become in the past 12 years — a city, he says, that is defined by its yawning inequities.  

    

“We are not, by our nature, an elitist city,” he told a group of young Democrats a few nights ago at a cramped bar in Brooklyn. “We are not a city for the chosen few.”
It is the campaign season’s riskiest calculation: that New Yorkers, who have become comfortably accustomed to the smooth-running, highly efficient apparatus of government under Michael R. Bloomberg, are prepared to embrace a much different agenda for City Hall — taxing the rich, elevating the poor and rethinking a Manhattan-centric approach to city services.

In a city that is endlessly congratulating itself for its modern renaissance — record-low crime, unmatched crowds of tourists, streets refashioned in European style — a day on the campaign trail with Mr. de Blasio is a reminder of unaddressed grievances and glaring disparities.
Describing what he calls a “tale of two cities,” rife with inequalities in housing, early childhood education and police tactics, he promised those gathered at the Brooklyn bar that this year’s mayoral race was “going to be a reset moment. A major reset.”
Mr. de Blasio [has] climbed to No. 2 behind Christine C. Quinn, the City Council speaker, in the latest poll by Quinnipiac University of likely Democratic voters.
----
Mr. de Blasio’s message, despite the excitement it has drawn from liberal luminaries like Alec Baldwin and Howard Dean, has alarmed many business leaders and Bloomberg aides, who see him as lacking a sophisticated understanding of the city’s economic success and displaying a naïveté about how quickly it can unravel.
----
Beyond that, Mr. de Blasio’s electoral path remains uncertain in a race against better-known Democrats. William C. Thompson Jr., a former comptroller, holds a natural appeal to the city’s fast-growing minority electorate, and Ms. Quinn is trying to capitalize on her history-making chance to become the city’s first lesbian mayor. In many ways, Mr. de Blasio, 52, is a man without a built-in voter base.
----
At the heart of Mr. de Blasio’s appeal, according to interviews with his supporters and political team, is a willingness to deliver an unvarnished and unstinting critique of the Bloomberg era in spite of polls that show a majority of New Yorkers believe the city is heading in the right direction under the mayor’s leadership.
-----
Zoning changes have encouraged sky-piercing condominiums with multimillion-dollar price tags, but Mr. Bloomberg vetoed a bill requiring paid sick leave for working-class New Yorkers. By the city’s own measure, 46 percent of residents are poor or near poor, but the mayor scoffed at plans to compel companies that receive city subsidies to pay higher wages. (Mr. de Blasio backs both the wage and paid sick leave measures.)
As he travels the city, Mr. de Blasio can barely contain his fury over what he sees as the central contradiction of the Bloomberg years: a mayor who routinely unleashed the power of government to change New Yorkers’ personal behavior repeatedly balked at harnessing it to change their economic circumstances.
-----
Mr. de Blasio’s campaign platform is unabashedly interventionist and progressive. His most eye-catching plan would raise the income tax rate to 4.3 percent from 3.87 percent on earnings of over $500,000, to pay for universal access to prekindergarten.
Now, an overcrowded system leaves tens of thousands of lower-income residents without access to full-day programs, setting back the early education of a generation, Mr. de Blasio argues. The campaign says the 11 percent increase in the marginal tax rate would amount to about $2,120 for a family earning $1 million.
In conversations with voters, Mr. de Blasio argues that Ms. Quinn and Mr. Thompson have been either unwilling or unable to sufficiently challenge the legacy of the mayor and the city’s corporations over the past decade.
Back at the bar in Brooklyn, Mr. de Blasio’s raw indignation won him a modest electoral victory. When a straw poll of those in the room was completed, around 10 p.m., he had soundly defeated his Democratic rivals.