Who’s winning the Democratic primary in the polls, one week ahead of the Iowa caucuses

Sanders and Biden are leading the polls, but the race remains very tight.

VOX

With the Iowa caucuses less than one week away, the 2020 Democratic primary is beginning to come into focus — six new polls paint a vivid picture of who’s in good shape before the first contest.

Nationally, former Vice President Joe Biden has been the frontrunner since before he announced his candidacy last April, and the latest national polls show him still topping the field, with a January Fox News poll finding he has 26 percent support, and a January ABC News/Washington Post poll showing 28 percent support.

But both polls found this lead to be threatened by Sen. Bernie Sanders, who has remained in second place in national polling averages since last November.

For much of late 2019, RealClearPolitics’ polling average showed Biden and Sanders separated by about 10 percentage points, but the former vice president’s lead has begun to narrow. Fox News’ latest poll puts Sanders directly below Biden at 23 percent support — within that survey’s 3 percentage point margin of error. Similarly, the ABC poll finds Sanders enjoying 24 percent support, again making Biden’s lead within the poll’s 3.5 percentage point margin of error.

These polls give good insight into how voters outside the early states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada are thinking about the candidates right now, but those opinions may change dramatically after the results of the first contests, particularly if the margins are stark in the final results.

Biden and Sanders’s strong national showings don’t mean they will win the nomination. At this point in 2016, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had a commanding lead on Sanders in polling averages, but only narrowly won Iowa — and was defeated by the senator in Vermont. And President Trump, who had a nearly 15 percentage point lead on Sen. Ted Cruz, narrowly lost Iowa to the senator.

So while these national polls are somewhat instructive, it is important to remember that before Biden and Sanders can worry about Super Tuesday states, they — and all their fellow candidates — have to first make it out of Iowa.

What do the latest Iowa polls say about the 2020 caucuses?

In Iowa, the latest polls reveal momentum for Sanders, but also suggest the race is still very open, with Biden, Sanders, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg forming a clear top tier, one that Sen. Amy Klobuchar could be poised to join.

Three of the four latest Iowa polls have Sanders as the caucuses’ frontrunner: An Emerson College poll puts his support at 30 percent; a New York Times/Siena College poll places him at 25 percent, and a CBS News/YouGov poll puts him at 26 percent. Biden leads in the fourth poll, from Suffolk University/USA Today, with 25.4 percent.

Biden is second in two of the polls led by Sanders (21 percent in Emerson College, and 25 percent in the CBS survey); Buttigieg is second in the Times poll, with 18 percent support. The CBS and Suffolk polls put the former mayor in third place; the Emerson poll in fourth. Warren is fourth in every poll, except for the Emerson survey, in which she is essentially tied with Buttigieg.

That tie is a telling one, as are most of the gaps between the candidates. Take the New York Times/Siena college poll for example, which has a margin of error of 3.9.

When that margin of error is taken into account, the frontrunner becomes less clear. Sanders’s 25 percent support could be more like 21.1 percent support, and if that’s the case, it could make Biden or Buttigieg the true frontrunner, and leave Klobuchar — who was found to have 8 percent support — ending the caucuses with backing that is more like 11.9 percent.

This isn’t to say that Siena’s pollsters — or any others who have recently released results — are wrong, but that the race is still very close.

Close polling aside, there’s still a lot of uncertainty around the caucuses

Adding to the uncertainty are three things: the fact that many respondents told pollsters their choices aren’t set in stone, that second choices can be as (or more) important as first choices in Iowa, and that three key candidates — Sanders, Warren, and Klobuchar — haven’t been able to campaign recently.

Emerson’s pollsters found 38 percent of Iowa Democrats and independents aren’t yet sure how they’ll caucus, a number large enough that could make or break someone’s campaign. Suffolk’s survey found similar results, with 45 percent saying they have a candidate they favor, but that they could still change their minds; and 13 percent said that, with days to go before the caucuses, they still aren’t even leaning toward one person in particular.

The good news for Sanders and Warren is that their supporters seem to be relatively locked in: Suffolk found about 60 percent of their current supporters said they are sure to caucus for them. About half — 53 percent — of Biden’s supporters said they are committed to him. Buttigieg had a 48 percent commitment rate, and Klobuchar, 42 percent. The other polls showed similar results, with Warren and Sanders supporters being the most steadfast.

Iowa’s system of assessing candidate viability makes Iowans’ second choices of great importance — essentially, Iowans who caucus for any candidate who does not receive at least 15 percent support in a given district are asked to caucus for their second choice.

Warren was the top second choice in the New York Times poll; Biden in the CBS survey. But it’s important to look at where that second choice support is coming from — for instance, many of the polls found that Sanders supporters overwhelmingly said Warren is their second choice. But given recent polls, it seems unlikely that Sanders will fail to clear the 15 percent mark, meaning his caucusgoers will not be required to throw their support elsewhere.

Instead, the backers of candidates like entrepreneur Andrew Yang (whose support polled between 1 and 5 percent in these most recent surveys), or even Klobuchar, could make all the difference.

The New York Times and Emerson surveys found that most Klobuchar backers like Biden as a second choice — which makes sense, given both occupy a moderate lane in the race. Emerson found 39 percent of Klobuchar supporters have Biden as their second choice; the New York Times put that number at 55 percent.

As is the case with the candidates in general, however, it isn’t clear how set in stone these second choices really are. Suffolk’s pollsters asked likely caucusgoers who said they don’t support any of that survey’s top five candidates — Biden, Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg, and Klobuchar — who they would support if they had to choose from one of those five. And 75 percent said they had no idea.

They have less than a week to figure it out. And they’ll have to do so without the benefit of direct interactions with the candidates — all the sitting senators currently running are taking part in the Senate impeachment trial. Some candidates have expressed concern that the fact they can’t do any last-minute campaigning will hurt them — Sanders, for instance has told reporters, “I would rather be in Iowa today. ... I’d rather be in New Hampshire and Nevada and so forth.”

But Suffolk’s work found the senators might not have anything to worry about: 88 percent of likely caucusgoers said the senators not being on the ground won’t affect how they caucus; only 5.2 percent said, “I expect candidates to be in Iowa to earn my vote.”

All this means that no one candidate — at least among those in the top tier — has a clear overall advantage against the others in Iowa. Any one of them could win. Or a number of them could “win,” with one taking home the most delegates, another taking the popular vote, and a third dominating headlines for doing far better than expected. But for whoever does come out on top, Iowa will only be step one: A close race means every early contest matters in developing an electability narrative, and New Hampshire’s primary is up next.

Who’s in the best shape depends on where you look

Polls show Sanders as the current strongest candidate in Iowa and New Hampshire, and he seems to be closing in on Biden nationally. But Biden isn’t exactly polling poorly in either of those first two states, and he has habitually topped polls in South Carolina, where voters will go to the polls at the end of February.

Warren has fallen from her perch atop the polls, but is a popular second choice — and she is racking up endorsements, like the coveted Des Moines Register endorsement she received Saturday. Buttigieg has also seen his support shrink from its late 2019 heights, but he is holding on — particularly in New Hampshire. And Klobuchar is making late gains in both Iowa and New Hampshire, now nearly cracking double digits in poll averages in each state.

Yang is also seeing something of a late rise — not enough to break into the top tier, but one that will put him back on the Democratic debate stage ahead of the New Hampshire primary. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is eschewing the early states in the hopes of raking in a massive delegate haul on Super Tuesday, is showing signs his strategy may be working: The latest national polls had favorable results, pushing the relative newcomer to the race up to a polling average of 8 percent.

All of this is to say, as primary season gets underway, that the race could still shake out in a number of unexpected ways.

Tight polls, impeachment, billionaire wild cards: Uncertainty reigns in the 2020 Democratic race

By Janet Hook, Los Angeles Times

As Democrats' top presidential candidates prepare to meet for the last debate before voters start weighing in, the primary contest remains one of the most unpredictable in decades — a contest not likely to end anytime soon.
© (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall) Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., speaks during a campaign stop at the Black Pearl Cafe, Thursday, Jan. 2, 2020, in Muscatine, Iowa.

In the absence of a commanding front-runner, and with a plethora of well-funded candidates in the top tier, party activists say they have less certainty about the outcome than at any time since 1992, when Bill Clinton ultimately won in a crowded field.


"I can't remember a time when I had this many questions before the first votes," said Rebecca Katz, a Democratic strategist who worked on John Edwards' 2004 presidential campaign. "Things could play out 100 different ways."

The sources of uncertainty are legion: Polls in Iowa and New Hampshire, the first two states to vote, show four candidates bunched closely at the top — former Vice President Joe Biden, former Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind., and Sens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. Even at this late date, more than half of Iowa Democrats are not certain whom they will back.

Two billionaire candidates are wild cards: Environmentalist Tom Steyer last week unexpectedly seized a place on the Iowa debate stage by doing well in polls in South Carolina and Nevada, which vote in mid- and late-February and where most other candidates were not running television ads.

Former New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg is spending sums unmatchable by other candidates to advertise in states, including California, that vote in the March 3 multi-state primary known as Super Tuesday.

© Joe Raedle/Getty Images North America/TNS People listen as Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) speaks during a campaign stop at Miller s Sports Bar and Restaurant on December 27, 2019 in Algona, Iowa.And President Trump's impeachment trial in the Senate is a logistical headache for senators still in the race. The trial may keep them in Washington during the last two weeks before the Feb. 3 Iowa caucuses, a crucial time for candidates to make their closing arguments in a state that prizes retail politics.

The stakes are high because the candidate who comes out on top in Iowa — even by a tiny margin — goes into subsequent primaries, starting with New Hampshire's on Feb. 11, with a gust of wind at his or her back.

"In the Olympics and presidential caucuses, the track looks crowded when they are running; but in the end, there will be a gold, a silver and a bronze," said Michael Meehan, who advised Sen. John Kerry during his 2004 presidential campaign. "Those are the people who will get a huge, bright spotlight."

Against this backdrop, six candidates will appear together on stage Tuesday for the last debate before the Iowa caucuses. Biden, Buttigieg, Sanders, Steyer and Warren, will be joined by Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, who sees the voting in Iowa, her neighboring state, as her best and probably last chance to vault into the upper tier.

Since the candidates' last debate, in Los Angeles in December, the House has impeached Trump, and the U.S. killing of a top Iranian general followed by Iranian missile attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq has shifted attention sharply from domestic to foreign affairs.

That could propel foreign policy to the forefront of Tuesday's debate, a shift of focus welcomed by Biden, who considers foreign policy his strong suit and is spotlighting it in Iowa.

"We live in the most dangerous moment in a generation," says the voice-over in a Biden ad in Iowa, which the campaign has updated to include references to the latest Iran news.

"This is a moment that requires strong, steady, stable leadership."

Sanders comes into the Iowa debate on a roll. He lost Iowa by a whisker to Hillary Clinton in 2016 and believes he can win it this time. He may bring to the stage an intensifying effort to challenge Biden's arguments that he is the safest choice to beat Trump and has the strongest foreign policy record.

Sanders has repeatedly attacked Biden's vote 17 years ago to give President George W. Bush authority for the Iraq war. Democrats need a nominee with bold ideas who can inspire the energy and excitement it will take to win the general election, he says, in a critique aimed at Biden.

Nina Turner, Sanders national campaign co-chairwoman, Sunday also published an op-ed in a South Carolina newspaper arguing that Sanders has a stronger record promoting racial justice than Biden, going after the support from African American voters that has been a core strength for the former vice president.

Warren, who is looking for a campaign comeback after a fall slump, has been trying to make a new case for her candidacy: In a field polarized between Biden and Sanders, she could be a consensus candidate, her campaign says, noting that she is to the left of Biden, but has a stronger connection to the party establishment than Sanders.

"More than any other candidate that's going to be on that debate stage in a few days, Elizabeth Warren is the candidate who can unite the entire Democratic Party," former rival Julián Castro said when he endorsed Warren last week.

"She can bring people together. She can appeal to all sides."

On Sunday, Warren made her unity pitch even as tensions rose over a report by Politico that the Sanders campaign had drafted a script for volunteers criticizing Warren for appealing mainly to upscale voters, not broadening the party's appeal — an unusual break in the cordial relations between the two progressive candidates.

"We all saw the impact of the factionalism in 2016, and we can't have a repeat of that," she told reporters in Iowa, referring to the bitter primary fight between Sanders and Hillary Clinton. "Democrats need to unite our party and that means pulling in all parts of the Democratic coalition."

Debate stakes are high for Buttigieg because he has invested so much in making his mark in Iowa and New Hampshire. He told supporters it was a "make-or-break moment" in the wake of recent polls.

"It's a dead heat in both Iowa and New Hampshire — two states where we have to do well in order to continue this campaign," he said in a recent fundraising email.

The stakes are even higher for Klobuchar. She will have to overperform her single-digit showing in polls to come away from Iowa with any delegates.

That could give her an incentive to again go on the attack against her rivals in the debate — against Buttigieg for being too young and inexperienced; Biden for being a man of another era; Warren and Sanders for being too far left.

That strategy is a double-edged sword. After the December debate, it brought an infusion of donations and attention, but it has yet to deliver the committed support she needs to be viable in Iowa or beyond.

A key audience for the nationally televised debate will be local: the many Iowa Democrats who have not firmly made up their minds.

The Iowa Poll by the Des Moines Register and CNN released Friday found that some 60% of likely caucusgoers were undecided or only lightly committed to their preferred candidate. Sanders came in first as the choice of 20% of likely caucusgoers, followed by Warren, Buttigieg and Biden, but the gap between first and fourth was smaller than the survey's margin of error, meaning the poll can't say who is truly on top.

Compared with the last Iowa Poll in mid-November, support for Sanders had risen, Buttigieg dropped, while Biden and Warren remained stable. The Iowa Poll lead has been a trophy that has been passed around among the top four: The No. 1 candidate in the previous three polls were Biden, Warren and Buttigieg.

The poll suggested that Sanders' supporters were the most committed. But Sean Bagniewski, chairman of the

Polk County Democrats, said the question for Sanders is whether his 20% showing is his floor or ceiling.

Whether "Iowans who are still making up their minds will consider him or not" will make the difference, he said.

The crowded top tier of candidates are all coming off a robust fundraising quarter that has equipped them with the resources to stay in the race well beyond Iowa.

Sanders consistently leads his rivals in raising money even as he refuses to hold private fundraisers and forsakes contributions from wealthy donors. The Vermont senator posted an impressive $34.5-million fundraising haul in the reporting period that ended Dec. 31.

But his rivals have plenty of cash. Biden rebounded from anemic fundraising earlier in the campaign to bring in $22.7 million in the last quarter. Buttigieg topped him with $24.7 million, and Warren, who like Sanders eschews private fundraising events, drew $21.2 million.

Bloomberg and Steyer are testing what bottomless personal wealth can buy in politics. The eye-popping $153 million Bloomberg has spent on television advertising dwarfs the $30 million Sanders, Buttigieg, Warren and Biden have spent combined, according to figures compiled by CNN.

Bloomberg is betting that if there is no clear front-runner out of the first four states, his investment in Super Tuesday states such as California, Texas and Virginia will pay off. But he has also said that he will continue to invest his own money — running anti-Trump ads and paying staff salaries — into the fall even if he does not win the Democratic nomination.

"I am running to defeat Donald Trump," he said at a Friday rally in Atlanta.

Staff writer Evan Halper in Washington contributed to this report.

———

©2020 the Los Angeles Times

Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com