May 15, 2025

Young boys are struggling,

BOY PROBLEMS

Young boys are struggling, and we wanted to figure out just how badly and why.

Boys enter kindergarten lagging behind girls in both academic readiness and behavior. A majority of teenagers agree that boys are more disruptive. Large shares say girls get better grades, have more leadership roles and speak up more in class.

Note: Survey conducted Sept. 18-Oct. 10. Home-schooled teens were not included. Shares of respondents who did not offer an answer are not shown. Source: Pew Research Center The New York Times


In interviews, young men say that school never felt like a good fit for them, or that they got the sense that teachers didn’t like boys, and that this left them feeling discouraged or undervalued. By high school, girls are more likely to graduate on time — and more likely to go to college.

Note: Individuals ages 16-24 are counted here if enrolled in a two- or four-year college by October in the year of their high school graduation or equivalent. Source: National Center for Education Statistics The New York Times


Young men are struggling in their mental health and transitions to adulthood, too. What’s going on here? I’m reporting a series on boys, the first installment of which published today. I’d love to hear your experiences and insights about what’s going on with boys, and what might be driving it. Tell The Times what you think here. — Claire Cain Miller

May 14, 2025

TRUMP VISITS THE GULF

Trump and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Doug Mills/The New York Times

Below, Michael Shear, a Times correspondent, explores Trump’s relationship with Saudi Arabia.

Trump is visiting the Gulf and meeting with leaders across the region. It has so far been a friendly trip: Trump has shown a chumminess, even infatuation, with his counterparts in the Saudi royal family. Here are three reasons Trump seems to love Saudi Arabia:

Gold, everywhere: I was in the group of reporters who traveled with Trump on his first trip to Saudi Arabia as president in 2017. The opulence was overwhelming. But it was clear that Trump, who has a famous preference for gilded architecture, loved it.

This trip appears to be the same. As my colleagues wrote: “With its giant crystal chandeliers, polished marble, plush carpets and prominently displayed portraits of King Salman bin Abdulaziz, the Saudi Royal Court had the feel of a Mar-a-Lago East.”

Business deals: Trump’s trip to Riyadh is, essentially, one big boardroom meeting. The president has also proved over the years that he appreciates — maybe even envies — strong leaders who have few constraints on the exercise of power. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia, certainly qualifies.

Money: Finally, there is Saudi’s vast wealth, which comes largely from oil. In his speech yesterday, Trump bragged about the American economy, calling it the “hottest country” in the world. Then he stopped himself, looked at the crown prince, and laughed. “With the exception of your country,” he said. “You’re hotter. At least as long as I’m up here, you’re hotter.”

On Trump’s agenda today 

Syria:
Trump met with the Syrian president today, for the first time. It’s a remarkable rise for the leader of the rebel uprising that ousted Bashar al-Assad. Trump said the U.S. would lift sanctions on Syria.

Iran: Trump said he wants a nuclear deal with Iran. Instead of dismantling its nuclear program, Iran has proposed a joint nuclear-enrichment venture involving Arab countries and U.S. investments.

Israel: The president won’t meet with Benjamin Netanyahu on this trip, signaling a growing rift.

War in Ukraine: The president said he would also consider joining a potential meeting this week between the leaders of Ukraine and Russia.

May 13, 2025

Gaza: Some Israeli military officials have privately admitted that Gaza is facing widespread starvation.

Israel’s government has publicly dismissed warnings of extreme food shortages after it blocked aid deliveries, but an internal analysis concluded that a crisis looms if food supplies are not restored.

Palestinians waiting to receive a cooked meal in Jabaliya camp, northern Gaza Strip, in April. Food supplies have dried up since Israel blocked aid deliveries in March.Credit...Saher Alghorra for The New York Times

By Natan Odenheimer and Ronen Bergman

Some Israeli military officials have privately concluded that Palestinians in Gaza face widespread starvation unless aid deliveries are restored within weeks, according to three Israeli defense officials familiar with conditions in the enclave.

For months, Israel has maintained that its blockade on food and fuel to Gaza did not pose a major threat to civilian life in the territory, even as the United Nations and other aid agencies have said a famine was looming.

But Israeli military officers who monitor humanitarian conditions in Gaza have warned their commanders in recent days that unless the blockade is lifted quickly, many areas of the enclave will likely run out of enough food to meet minimum daily nutritional needs, according to the defense officials. They spoke on the condition of anonymity to share sensitive details.

Because it takes time to scale up humanitarian deliveries, the officers said that immediate steps were needed to ensure that the system to supply aid could be reinstated fast enough to prevent starvation.

The growing acknowledgment within part of the Israeli security establishment of a hunger crisis in Gaza comes as Israel has vowed to dramatically expand the war in Gaza to destroy Hamas and bring back the remaining hostages — twin aims that more than 19 months of war have yet to achieve. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was defiant, and said the military would resume fighting in the coming days “in full force to finish the job” and “eliminate Hamas.”

Mr. Netanyahu’s statement came on the same day that President Trump landed in Saudi Arabia, as part of his first major foreign trip since his re-election. Mr. Trump, however, is not visiting Israel, underscoring a growing divide between two leaders who increasingly disagree on some of the most critical security issues facing Israel.

The military officials’ analysis has exposed a gulf between Israel’s public stance on the aid blockade and its private deliberations. It reveals that parts of the Israeli security establishment have reached the same conclusions as leading aid groups. They have warned for months of the dangers posed by the blockade.

The analysis also highlights the urgency of the humanitarian situation in Gaza: Most bakeries have shut, charity kitchens are closing and the United Nations’ World Food Program, which distributes aid and coordinates shipments, says it has run out of food stocks.On Monday, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a U.N.-backed initiative that monitors malnutrition, warned that famine was imminent in Gaza. If Israel proceeds with a planned military escalation in Gaza, the initiative said in a summary report, “The vast majority of people in the Gaza Strip would not have access to food, water, shelter, and medicine.”

The Israeli military and the Israeli ministry of defense declined to comment on the Israeli officers’ predictions that Gaza is nearing a food crisis. Oren Marmorstein, a spokesman for Israel’s foreign ministry, said he was unable to share details from internal discussions but that the ministry was in contact with “all the relevant agencies on an ongoing daily basis” and closely monitors the situation in Gaza.

Israeli restrictions on aid to Gaza have been one of the most contentious issues of the war. Israel cut off supplies to Gaza in March, shortly before breaking a cease-fire with Hamas, which remains entrenched in Gaza despite losing thousands of fighters and control over much of the territory during the war.

Israel said the aim of the blockade was to reduce the Palestinian armed group’s ability to access and profit from food and fuel meant for civilians. In the process, a senior Israeli defense official said, Hamas would be more likely to collapse or at least release more of the hostages that the group captured during its attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023 that ignited the war.

Editors’ Picks
On Florida’s Gulf Coast, They Sought Their Starter Home for $500,000

Can I Wear a Sheath Dress Without Looking Like a MAGA Woman?

Jalapeño Wine Delights TikTok but Confuses Bartenders


Image

Trump is Back in Office, Trump Profits Bigly.

Now that President Trump is back in office, his family is profiting from his brand: At least $2 billion has flowed to Trump companies in just the last month. The ventures include real estate, a cryptocurrency and a private club slated to open in Washington with a $500,000 membership fee. Now, Qatar may give him a new presidential airplane.

The ethical mess is obvious. Trump is both the commander in chief and a business partner of foreign governments in Serbia, the United Arab Emirates and Oman. The White House says his sons run his companies, so there’s no conflict. Legally, that’s true.

But Trump is still getting rich (or richer) from all of it. And that leaves incentives for the president to pay back his business partners with policy decisions designed to help them, which is how the law defines corruption. Today’s newsletter is a tour of the recent deals.

Crypto

$TRUMP is the family’s cryptocurrency, owned by the president and run by Donald Trump Jr. It has no inherent value beside what people will pay for it; the family describes it as a collectible — like a baseball card. But every time someone purchases a coin (currently worth about $13), the family gets a share. Recently, the president offered rewards. The top 220 buyers are invited to dinner with him next week at his Virginia golf club. The top 25 buyers also get a White House tour. The winners of the contest spent at least $174 million to buy $TRUMP coins.
Through an investment firm, the United Arab Emirates put $2 billion into the Trump family’s new cryptocurrency outfit, World Liberty Financial. The company, whose leaders include Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., will make tens of millions of dollars per year from the investment.

Real estate


Eric Trump in Doha, Qatar. Bassam Masoud/Reuters

Qatar chipped in to help finance a Trump-branded beachside golf and luxury villa project in the country worth $5.5 billion. (We don’t know how much it contributed.) The family will earn millions in licensing and management fees.
A real estate firm in Saudi Arabia (with close ties to the country’s government) invested $1 billion in the Trump International Hotel and Tower project in Dubai. The same company is planning to build other new Trump hotels, golf courses and luxury towers in Saudi Arabia and Oman. These, too, are branding deals that will pay the Trumps millions of dollars for their name.
During the Balkan wars, NATO bombed Yugoslavia’s Defense Ministry in Belgrade. Now Serbia’s president is leasing the land to Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, who will erect a Trump hotel on the site. Kushner’s private equity company — funded mostly by Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds — will help cover the $1 billion project.

Other deals

Plane: Qatar is planning to give a $400 million Boeing 747 aircraft to the president so he can use it as a temporary Air Force One. His presidential library will own the plane after his presidency, Trump says.
Members’ club: Donald Trump Jr. and other investors say they will open the Executive Branch, a private social club, in Georgetown this summer. Its members will include lobbyists, tech industry bigwigs and a sprinkling of White House officials, such as David Sacks, who is Trump’s crypto czar. The cost to join: $500,000.

Golf: LIV Golf, the new Saudi-backed golf league, hosted a professional tournament at Trump National Doral in Florida last month. The president arrived on a military helicopter to kick it off. The league is run by the head of Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund. It paid the Trump family an undisclosed fee to host the LIV tournament. The event also drove thousands of fans to the hotel resort, selling out its rooms and restaurants.

Hotels: During Trump’s first term, dignitaries stayed at Trump properties and Republicans put on events there. These payments collectively were in the tens of millions of dollars. Payments like these have resumed. Groups like the Republican National Committee have put on events at the Doral resort and the Mar-a-Lago club, for instance.


For more: Trump is pushing ethics guardrails. Republicans on Capitol Hill seem unlikely to challenge him.


China Exults in Trump’s Tariff Pullback. Xi presses on with strategy of defiance against trade war ‘bullying’.

By Chun Han Wong
and Jason Douglas

May 13, 2025 8:28 am ET

Chinese leader Xi Jinping has made a show of defying U.S. pressure. PHOTO: ANDY WONG/ASSOCIATED PRESS


Key Points

U.S. and China agree to a 90-day tariff pause, easing trade war tensions and boosting China’s economy.

Xi Jinping hails the tariff truce as a win, potentially slowing down needed economic policy changes.

Despite the truce, China faces economic challenges and must stay vigilant against further U.S. pressure.


SINGAPORE—A U.S.-China agreement to pause bruising tariffs was cheered in Beijing as vindication for leader Xi Jinping and his defiant response to President Trump’s trade war, while providing a much-needed boost to China’s ailing economy.

During talks in Geneva this past weekend, U.S. and Chinese officials put the brakes on a spiraling trade war between the world’s two largest economies. They agreed to a 90-day pause on most of the tariffs they had imposed on each other since April and pledged further negotiations.

Xi had directed an uncompromising response to Trump’s tariffs, retaliating with a range of economic countermeasures and whipping up nationalist fervor against what Beijing denounced as American bullying.

His perceived success could dampen Beijing’s will to pursue policy overhauls that many see as necessary to lift the Chinese economy, even without the added pressure to act from Trump’s tariffs, some economists say.

Xi reinforced his message on Tuesday at a Beijing gathering of leaders and foreign ministers from Latin American and Caribbean countries, amid China’s efforts to rally international opinion against Trump’s global tariffs.

“Bullying and hegemonism will only result in self-isolation,” Xi said, addressing an audience that included the presidents of Brazil, Chile and Colombia.

On Chinese social media, opinion leaders portrayed the tariff truce as a resounding victory for Xi.

“China fought a very beautiful ‘counterattack in self-defense,’” said Ren Yi, a commentator who goes by the pen name “Chairman Rabbit,” in an online post. Beijing showed the world that Trump is irrational and America is a paper tiger, while China offers stability and certainty, he wrote.

Trump has pledged to use tariffs to restore U.S. industrial might and slash America’s $295 billion trade deficit with China, a goal that would require Beijing to drastically overhaul its economic model.

Xi has made a show of defying U.S. pressure and leaned into his self-styled image as a staunch steward of Chinese sovereignty. He has repeatedly expressed his belief that China will usher out the era of American dominance, a process aided by Western capitalist excess.

Under the agreement reached in Geneva, the U.S. agreed to lower the base level of tariffs on most Chinese goods to 30% from 145%, while China would cut its levies on U.S. products to 10% from 125%.

The tariff reprieve means China’s economic prospects for this year just got somewhat brighter, as the risk of a drawn-out trade war recedes for now and gives exporters more time to adjust to shifting global trade patterns.

Chinese exports to the U.S. sank 21% on the year after sky-high tariffs came into effect in April, Chinese customs data showed. Analysts and executives feared trade between the two superpowers would shrivel further and put millions of Chinese factory jobs at risk.
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in Geneva on Monday. PHOTO: EMMA FARGE/REUTERS

Now, economists expect a rush of shipments as firms race to restock, especially as tariffs could rise again if the two sides make little progress during the 90-day window for talks.

Outside Official Will Take Over Deadly Rikers Island Jail, Judge Orders

Laura Taylor Swain, a federal judge, seized control of New York City’s lockups, which have been rife with violence and dysfunction.

New York City has spent more than $500,000 per inmate annually in recent years, but detainees still sometimes go without food or medical care.Credit...José A. Alvarado Jr. for The New York Times


By Hurubie Meko
May 13, 2025


A federal judge overseeing New York City’s jails took Rikers Island out of the city’s control on Tuesday, ordering that an outside official be appointed to make major decisions regarding the troubled and violent jail complex.

The judge, Laura Taylor Swain, said in a 77-page ruling that the official would report directly to her and would not be a city employee, turning aside Mayor Eric Adams’s efforts to maintain control of the lockups. The official, called a remediation manager, would work with the New York City correction commissioner, but be “empowered to take all actions necessary” to turn around the city’s jails, she wrote.

“While the necessary changes will take some time, the court expects to see continual progress toward these goals,” Judge Swain wrote.

The order comes nearly a decade after the city’s jails, which include the Rikers Island complex, fell under federal oversight in the settlement of a class-action lawsuit. The agreement focused on curbing the use of force and violence toward both detainees and correction officers. A court-appointed monitor issued regular reports on the persistent mayhem.

New York City has held onto its control of Rikers with white knuckles — struggling to show progress and reaching the brink of losing oversight of the jails as critics of the system have called for a receiver. Conditions have not improved, according to lawyers for the plaintiffs and the federal monitor.

The city’s jail population has grown to more than 7,000 from a low of about 4,000 in 2020. And in the first three months of this year, five people died at Rikers or shortly after being released from city custody, equaling the number of detainees who died in all of 2024.

In a statement, lawyers from the Legal Aid Society and Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel, which represent detainees, said they commended the court’s “historic decision.”

“For years, the New York City Department of Correction has failed to follow federal court orders to enact meaningful reforms, allowing violence, disorder and systemic dysfunction to persist,” said Mary Lynne Werlwas and Debra Greenberger. “This appointment marks a critical turning point.”

The remediation manager will be a receiver in all but name. The official will be granted “broad powers” as plaintiffs had asked, Judge Swain wrote, but will also develop a plan for improvement in concert with the correction commissioner.

Editors’ Picks
How the Rubik’s Cube Taught Me to Be a Better Parent

19 Easy, Budget-Friendly Pastas That Don’t Skimp on Flavor

1 Astronaut, Many Cameras and 220 Days of Amazing Images From Space



Such arrangements are the last resort for a troubled jail or prison. Since 1974, federal courts have put only nine jail systems in receivership, not counting Tuesday’s Rikers order.

The ruling was another blow for Mr. Adams, who is fighting for his political life after the Trump administration dropped corruption charges against him so that he could assist with its deportation efforts. Many of his confidants have also faced investigations, he is on his fourth police commissioner and his approval ratings have hit historic lows.

Now, the mayor, a former police captain, has lost most control of an institution that employs about 5,000 people represented by the Correction Officers’ Benevolent Association, a union that has been a bastion of political support.

On Tuesday, even as prisoners rights organizations and some of Mr. Adams’s campaign opponents celebrated, the mayor disputed whether Judge Swain’s order constituted a receivership and painted it as a benefit.

“The problems at Rikers are decades in the making,” he said. “We finally got stability.”

In a statement, Benny Boscio, president of the correction officers’ union, said that Judge Swain’s order had preserved the right to representation and collective bargaining, and he made clear that his union must be reckoned with.

“The city’s jails cannot operate without us,” he said. “And no matter what the new management of our jails looks like, the path toward a safer jail system begins with supporting the essential men and women who help run the jails every day.”

New York City has spent more than $500,000 per inmate annually in recent years, according to city data, well beyond what other large cities have spent, and yet detainees still sometimes go without food or proper medical care.

A New York Times investigation in 2021 found that guards are often stationed in inefficient ways that fail to protect detainees. And although the jail system has consistently been the most well-staffed in the United States — there is roughly one uniformed officer for each inmate at Rikers, according to city data — an unlimited sick leave policy and other uses of leave have meant that there are too few guards present to keep inmates safe.

The class-action lawsuit that led to the takeover, known as Nunez v. City of New York, was settled in June 2015 and required that the jails be overseen by a court-appointed monitor who would issue regular reports on conditions there but would wield no direct power to effect change.

Through those reports, Judge Swain was given an extensive history of the cyclical nature of the jail system’s problems. Through the administration of two mayors and several correction commissioners, the jails continued to devolve, according to prisoners’ rights advocates and the monitor’s reports. In November, the judge found the city in contempt for failing to stem violence and excessive force at the facility, which is currently run by Correction Commissioner Lynelle Maginley-Liddie.

Over the years, the city has argued that the Department of Correction has made progress, even as Judge Swain issued remedial orders and the monitor and prisoners’ advocates pointed to backsliding.

In 2023, Damian Williams, then Manhattan’s top prosecutor, joined calls for the appointment of an outside authority to take control of Rikers, saying that the city had been “unable or unwilling” to make reforms under two mayors and four correction commissioners.

On Tuesday, Jay Clayton, whom President Trump appointed last month as interim U.S. attorney, said Judge Swain’s decision was a “welcomed and much needed milestone.”

In a 65-page opinion last year, Judge Swain said that the city and the Department of Correction had violated the constitutional rights of prisoners and staff members by exposing them to danger, and had intentionally ignored her orders for years. Officials had fallen into an “unfortunate cycle” in which initiatives were abandoned and then restarted under new administrations, she wrote.

An inability to operate independently of politics is what has kept Rikers from turning around, said Elizabeth Glazer, the founder of Vital City and a former criminal justice adviser under Mayor Bill de Blasio.

“Every new administration, there’s a reset,” she said. “Every new crisis, there’s a reset.”

Last year, Judge Swain ordered city leaders to meet with lawyers for prisoners to create a plan for an “outside person,” known as a receiver, who could run the system.

The parties met in recent months to try to reach an agreement, in deliberations overseen by the federal monitor, Steve J. Martin. He told the court that the parties and his team had been “actively engaged” in discussions.

In the end, the sides submitted dueling proposals.

The Legal Aid Society and a private law firm representing incarcerated people argued that the court should strip the city of control and install a receiver who would answer only to the court. The receiver should be given broad power to make changes, they proposed, including with regard to staffing and union contracts that govern it.

The receiver, they said, could “review, investigate and take disciplinary or other corrective or remedial actions with respect to violations of D.O.C. policies, procedures and protocols” related to the court order.

May 12, 2025

Here Is Everything That Has Changed Since Congestion Pricing Started in New York

Fewer cars. Faster travel. Less honking. And More


By Emily Badger, Stefanos Chen, Asmaa Elkeurti, Winnie Hu, Francesca Paris and Ethan Singer

The reporters sought information from everyone they could think of, including the M.T.A., the Fire Department, restaurant-booking platforms, researchers and one yellow school bus company.May 11, 2025

Policy changes often take years to show results. Even then, you may have to squint to see them.

And then there is congestion pricing in New York.

Almost immediately after the tolls went into effect Jan. 5 — charging most vehicles $9 to enter Manhattan from 60th Street south to the Battery — they began to alter traffic patterns, commuter behavior, transit service, even the sound of gridlock and the on-time arrival of school buses.
What’s changed since the toll began?
Cars on the street
Fewer

Traffic speeds
Faster

Peak commute times
Faster still

Local buses
Faster, less delayed

Traffic outside the zone
Not worse

New Jersey commutes
Faster

Transit ridership
Up, up, up

Yellow taxi trips
Up

Citi Bike trips
Up in and out of the zone

Car crash injuries
Down

Parking violations
Down

Traffic noise complaints
Down

Fire response times
Slightly down

School bus delays
Fewer

Visitors to the zone
Up

Restaurants, Broadway
Holding up

Pollution
Too soon to say

Lower-income commuters
Too soon to say

Public opinion
Not great, but improving

Evidence has mounted that the program so far is achieving its two main goals — reducing congestion and raising revenue for transit improvements — even as the federal government has ramped up pressure to halt it. In March, the tolls raised $45 million in net revenue, putting the program on track to generate roughly $500 million in its first year.

Congestion pricing was designed to finance more than $15 billion in critical transit upgrades. Those investments will take years. But the parallel changes at street level are already apparent.

Here’s what we know so far.

Traffic in the zone

Fewer cars are entering the congestion zone than before.

The idea was that many people, faced with a toll, would stop driving into the heart of Manhattan. So far, that appears to have happened.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority estimates that about 76,000 fewer vehicles per day entered the congestion zone in April than probably would have without the toll. That’s the equivalent of 2.3 million fewer cars for the month, or 12 percent fewer than would have been expected given historical traffic trends.

These numbers are based on the M.T.A.’s best guess of what would have happened without congestion pricing. (The cameras that are now counting cars entering the zone every day weren’t fully installed in January 2024, so we can’t compare exact car counts with this same time last year.)

The Port Authority, which separately controls the tunnels entering Manhattan from New Jersey, released initial data for January showing that 8 percent fewer cars entered through the Lincoln Tunnel, and 5 percent fewer through the Holland Tunnel, compared with January 2024. But the agency has not released data for February and March.

Traffic is moving faster.

With fewer cars on the road, speeds are up.

Inside the congestion zone, as more workers returned to the office, average speeds had steadily declined since 2021, according to New York City Department of Transportation data that tracks the movement of vehicles licensed by the Taxi and Limousine Commission. Then starting in January of this year, that trend reversed.

Average car speed in the congestion zone

An outside analysis from researchers at Stanford, Yale and Google looked at anonymized, aggregated data from trips taken with Google Maps and found that average traffic speeds inside the zone increased by 15 percent in the first two months of congestion pricing. That's compared with what the researchers estimate would have happened without the toll, given traffic trends in other cities.


The greatest speed gains are coming at peak commute times.


Speed improvements have been greatest at the most gridlocked times, during the evening weekday peak.

Change in car speeds, 2024-25

Peak commute hours refers to the evening weekday peak, from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. Comparisons are between January to mid-April of each year. Source: N.Y.C.D.O.T.

The Google study found a similar pattern but an even larger effect in the program’s first two months, with speeds inside the congestion zone improving by more than 20 percent during weekday rush hours from 3 p.m. to 7 p.m.


Local buses are also moving faster.


M.T.A. bus speeds were also up January through March by about 3.2 percent compared with last year on the portions of local routes that run through the congestion zone. Gains have come on nearly every local route touching the zone.

Change in bus speeds on local routes, 2024-2025

Speeds between January through March of each year. Congestion zone speeds measure route segments inside the zone and include one stop before entry and one stop after exit. The rest of Manhattan excludes these segments. Source: M.T.A. bus speed data

Similar gains have come on express bus routes.

Some of the fastest improvements have been on local routes that cross the river on their way into the congestion zone. On route B39, which collects passengers at the Williamsburg Bridge Plaza in Brooklyn before entering the zone, speeds were up the first three months of the year by roughly 34 percent (a majority of the B39’s full route spans the bridge).


Traffic elsewhere

Traffic has not slowed just outside the congestion zone.


One major fear about congestion pricing is that it would improve traffic in the zone simply by pushing cars and congestion elsewhere. But so far, it appears that hasn’t happened.

According to Department of Transportation data, speeds in adjacent neighborhoods north of 60th Street in Manhattan and just across the river in Brooklyn and Queens, as well as in the rest of the city, have been flat or slightly faster than last year, depending on the time of day.

Traffic has not surged in the South Bronx, as some predicted.

Community groups were especially concerned that drivers avoiding the tolls might be diverted and drive more pollution to the South Bronx, which has some of the highest rates of asthma in the nation. But the number of vehicles traveling daily on the Cross Bronx Expressway was down slightly in January through April, compared with last year, according to the New York State Department of Transportation. And speeds were up about 2 to 3 percent during weekday work hours.


Signs are also positive for New Jersey commuters.

New Jersey Transit has not released bus speed data, limiting what we know about New Jersey commutes. But many M.T.A. express buses from Staten Island run through New Jersey and cross into Manhattan through the Lincoln Tunnel, sharing the same lanes used by many New Jersey buses and commuters.

 M.T.A. bus routes went through the Lincoln Tunnel nearly 24 percent faster on average after congestion pricing went into effect.

The researchers using Google Maps data, who were able to analyze New Jersey commutes, found that congestion pricing increased speeds by about 8 percent for drivers making trips from Hudson and Bergen counties into the congestion zone.


Residents of lower-income neighborhoods have seen faster travel, too.

The Google study also found consistently faster trips into the congestion zone — with speeds up by about 8 to 9 percent — whether drivers were coming from poorer or richer parts of the region.

That doesn’t address all the concerns of critics who warned that the toll would burden working-class drivers. But it does suggest that those drivers are sharing in the traffic benefits.

Driving alternatives

Ridership is up across all modes of public transit.

While the number of cars on the road is down, transit ridership is up, suggesting many commuters have switched.

From early January through mid-April, compared with the same time last year, ridership has increased on the bus and the subway for the M.T.A. It’s also up on the Long Island Rail Road, the Staten Island Railway and the Metro-North commuter lines that serve the northern suburbs and parts of Connecticut.

Average daily M.T.A. ridership

20242025changeBus 1.1 mil. 1.2 mil. +13%
Long Island Rail Road 186k 207k +11%
NYC Subway 3.2 mil. 3.4 mil. +8.2%
Metro-North Railroad 163k 176k +8.2%
Staten Island Railway 5.4k 5.7k +4.4%



Ridership from Jan. 5 to April 21 in each year. Source: M.T.A.

On the PATH commuter train that serves New Jersey commuters crossing the Hudson River, ridership is also up — by nearly 6 percent — in the first three months of the year compared with last year. New Jersey Transit, which runs a different rail and bus system into Manhattan, has not shared data, but stated it had “no evidence at this time that congestion pricing is having an appreciable impact on ridership.” (The policy is especially fraught in New Jersey, where officials are suing to stop congestion pricing in federal court.)

The Trump administration has seized on a number of high-profile crimes to paint mass transit as unsafe and a poor substitute for commuters who drive to the city. But on the subway, crime is dropping. In the first three months of 2025, criminal offenses in the subway fell to the second-lowest level in 27 years, with an 18 percent drop in major crime categories, police data shows.


Yellow taxi trips inside the zone are up, too.

Yellow taxi rides starting or ending in the congestion zone are up this year — there were about eight million trips across the first three months of the year, compared with about seven million in the same period last year.

Taxi passengers on routes that touch the zone pay an additional 75 cents per ride (those riding in for-hire vehicles, like Uber, pay $1.50). Many in the taxi industry worried that an added cost to fares would discourage riders and further harm an industry that’s been losing business for years. So far, that hasn’t happened.


Citi Bike trips in the zone are up, but they’re up citywide.


It’s less clear that people are switching to biking. According to Citi Bike, ridership in the bike-sharing program through April 20 is up similarly both inside the congestion zone and citywide, 8 to 9 percent, compared with last year. But Citi Bike has expanded the network over time, making direct trip comparisons with earlier years imperfect.

The Department of Transportation also maintains some bike counters inside the congestion zone that count cyclists on personal bikes and Citi Bikes. Those counters show a very slight decline in trips compared with last year, while counters outside the congestion zone show a small bump in trips. Biking is also more subject to weather, and this past winter was especially cold.

In short, it’s probably too soon to say much about the effects of congestion pricing on biking.

Ripple effects

Car crashes and injuries have declined.

With fewer cars on the road in the congestion zone, there have been fewer car crashes — and fewer resulting injuries. Crashes in the zone that resulted in injuries are down 14 percent this year through April 22, compared with the same period last year, according to police reports detailing motor vehicle collisions. The total number of people injured in crashes (with multiple people sometimes injured in a single crash) declined 15 percent.

Crashes and injuries are also down citywide outside the congestion zone, but by less, suggesting that the tolls could be a factor in the difference.

The story here may largely be about fewer cars creating fewer opportunities for collision. But Philip Miatkowski, senior director for research and policy at Transportation Alternatives, said that less congestion may also be increasing safety in other ways, like less double-parking and blocked intersections, or less road rage.

Parking violations are down.

Data on parking violations suggests that certain types of risky driver behavior are declining. Violations issued within the congestion zone — for infractions like double-parking or parking in no-parking zones — were down nearly 4 percent from January through mid-April compared with last year. Over this time, there was a small increase in violations in the rest of Manhattan.

Fewer New Yorkers are complaining about traffic noise.

Vehicle-related noise complaints to the city’s 311 portal dropped by nearly half in the zone from 2024 to 2025. Similar car-related complaints also fell outside the zone, but not as sharply.

Change in vehicle noise complaints, 2024-25
In zoneRest of NYC-45%-27%

The city’s Department of Environmental Protection also operates two noise cameras inside the congestion zone. They detect noises greater than 85 decibels and, like a red-light camera, record the offending vehicle. Between Jan. 5 and April 4 of 2024, the department issued 27 horn-honking summonses. Over that time this year, it issued six, with another eight pending.


Fire response times are improving.

Average travel times for the Fire Department’s responses to fires inside the congestion zone dropped by about 3 percent in January through March of this year compared with the same period last year, according to Fire Department dispatch data. These times rose by less than 1 percent in the rest of New York.

It’s probably too early to tell whether the speedup inside the zone is the result of congestion pricing. Travel times can fluctuate year to year, and Fire Department officials cautioned that congestion pricing was only one possible factor.

Average travel times for ambulances had been steadily increasing since the pandemic, according to emergency service dispatch data. Those ambulance times rose again this year, but at a slower rate inside the congestion zone than elsewhere.

More students are arriving to class on time.

One school bus company, NYC School Bus Umbrella Services (NYCSBUS), has found that, compared with last year, the share of buses arriving at schools late has dropped more inside the congestion zone than outside it.

The company calculates that those reduced delays inside the zone have meant that bused students receive more than 30 additional minutes of instruction time per week on average.

NYCSBUS contracts with the city to serve about 10 percent of New York’s bus routes for school-aged kids, so its numbers don’t cover every school bus inside the congestion zone but offer a good sample.


City buses are becoming more dependable.


Commuters care a lot about a metric that’s related to speed but distinct from it: Does the bus come when the schedule says it will?

More bus routes in the congestion zone are now running without delays, according to M.T.A. data. Bus delays have declined citywide, but the improvement has been greater within the zone.

Economic impact

Visitors are up in the congestion zone.


Critics have argued that the toll would scare off tourists and hurt local businesses. So far, there’s not much evidence of that, even as some businesses report signs that declining international tourism and tariffs are starting to pinch.

In March, just over 50 million people visited business districts inside the congestion zone, or 3.2 percent more than in the same period last year, according to the New York City Economic Development Corporation (its estimate tries to exclude people who work or live in the area).

And according to the Times Square Alliance, the number of pedestrian visitors to Times Square through April 22 this year was almost identical — about 21.5 million people — to the number in the same period last year.

Other business measures are doing OK so far.

Broadway theater capacity is essentially flat compared with last year, after accounting for the increased number of shows this year.

Online restaurant reservations through the platform Open Table are up by about 7 percent in the congestion zone through April 22 compared with last year. That’s similar to the trend citywide, according to the company.

And just to take a different kind of measure, The New York Times visited 40 storefronts on a stretch of Bleecker Street in Greenwich Village to gauge how businesses felt about congestion pricing. People working in four of those businesses said the change had been positive, 10 said it had been negative — and 25 said it had had no impact.

These are just slices of the Manhattan economy, and it’s not hard to find individual business owners who feel things are worse because of congestion pricing. But those effects don’t seem to be showing up yet at scale.

Too soon to say

It’s too early to know if pollution is declining.

Supporters of congestion pricing said it would also create environmental benefits, with fewer polluting cars on the road (and idling in gridlock or circling for parking).

The New York City health department’s readings of PM2.5, one air quality measure, improved citywide the first three months of this year compared with the same period in 2024. The improvement was more pronounced within the congestion zone, but it’s too early to attribute that to the program, or to know if that’s a lasting pattern, experts said.

If a downward trend in emissions showed up over the long term, it would mirror what happened in other cities after they put in congestion pricing. In London, rates of health problems aggravated by car pollution, like asthma, declined.

The full effects on lower-income commuters aren’t clear.

Critics of congestion pricing have warned that the tolls could harm lower-income commuters who lack access to transit. In response, the M.T.A. has carved out a 50 percent discount on peak tolls for drivers who make less than $50,000 a year. Some drivers can also apply for a tax credit.

But if those workers still feel they can’t afford to commute to the congestion zone, they may over time change jobs or face narrower job prospects. It will take time to track these changes, which could also be influenced by a worsening economic outlook.

In other ways, lower-income workers, who are more likely to use mass transit, stand to benefit from bus and rail investments that will be financed by the toll revenue. Some of the improvements, including new elevators and a more reliable signal system in the subway, are already underway.

An unpopular policy may be growing less so.

Congestion pricing was unpopular in opinion polling just before it started. But its backers expected that it would grow more popular as people saw the benefits.

It’s still early to say that for sure. Several pollsters have surveyed the public about congestion pricing, but without repeating the same question across multiple surveys. That makes it harder to track changes in opinion. Some early signs, however, suggest the program is growing more popular (or, at least, that many New Yorkers don’t like President Trump’s intervention).

A Siena College poll in December, for example, found that only 32 percent of New York City voters supported the program (29 percent statewide). But by March, 42 percent said it should remain in place (compared with 33 percent statewide). Most recently, in early April, a Marist poll also found that 42 percent of city voters want the program to stay — still not a majority, but perhaps getting closer.

Republicans Propose Paring Medicaid Coverage but Steer Clear of Deeper Cuts

The proposal, which is to be considered this week by a key House panel, omits some of the furthest-reaching reductions to the health program but would leave millions without coverage or facing higher costs.

Republicans have toiled under House Speaker Mike Johnson to find $880 billion in savings over a decade and assemble a number of cuts large enough to meet that goal.Credit...Tierney L. Cross for The New York Times

By Margot Sanger-Katz and Catie Edmondson
Reporting from Washington
May 12, 2025Updated 5:14 p.m. ET


House Republicans released a plan late on Sunday that would cause millions of poor Americans to lose Medicaid health coverage and millions more to pay higher fees when they go to the doctor, but that stopped short of an overhaul that would make the deepest cuts to the program.

The proposal, which is one piece of a sweeping bill to enact President Trump’s domestic agenda, including large tax cuts and increased military spending, omits the structural changes to Medicaid that ultraconservative Republicans have demanded. Instead, it bows to the wishes of a group of more moderate and politically vulnerable G.O.P. lawmakers whose seats could be at risk if they embraced deep Medicaid cuts.

It was published late Sunday night by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which under the G.O.P. budget blueprint had to find $880 billion in savings over a decade. The panel is scheduled to meet on Tuesday afternoon to debate and refine the package.

Republicans have toiled to assemble a number of cuts large enough to meet that goal, which fiscal hawks have insisted upon, while appeasing lawmakers from districts where Medicaid enrollment is widespread.

Overall, the legislation would reduce federal spending by an estimated $912 billion over the decade and cause 8.6 million people to become uninsured, according to a partial analysis from the Congressional Budget Office that was circulated by Democrats on the committee. Most of those cuts —$715 billion — would come from changes to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act.

The legislation’s remaining savings would come largely from changes in energy policy, including the repeal of two Biden-era regulations that affect car pollution and auto efficiency.

But the Medicaid portion was the most divisive and is likely to continue to be the most hotly debated as the proposal — which must be approved by the committee and then pass the House and Senate — makes its way through Congress.

The legislation released on Sunday tries to split the difference between Republicans agitating for deep cuts to Medicaid and those eager to protect their states from changes that could force them to shoulder much higher costs. It excludes several policies under consideration that would create large holes in state budgets and instead focuses on policies that cause Medicaid beneficiaries, particularly those who were covered as part of an expansion under Obamacare, to pay more fees and complete more paperwork to use their coverage.

“Congress didn’t take an ax to the expansion group,” said Julian Polaris, a partner with Manatt Health, a consulting firm that focuses on Medicaid. “But they have made it much more challenging to get covered for that group, and to get care for that group.”

Editors’ Picks
How to Raise Super-Achievers? Hint: It’s Not the Cereal.

The Tech Guys Are Fighting. Literally.

3 Ways to Cultivate Joy



It also adds a work requirement to Medicaid for poor, childless adults, mandating that they prove they are working 80 hours every month to stay enrolled. That is a less flexible version of a work requirement briefly imposed in Arkansas in 2018 that caused 18,000 people to rapidly lose coverage.



Hollywood groups called for tax changes after Trump’s tariff threat.

A tariff truce with China demonstrates the limits of Trump’s aggression.


Even some Republicans in the Senate who have been vocal about their opposition to cutting Medicaid benefits, including Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Josh Hawley of Missouri, have said they are open to adding some work requirements to the program. Mr. Trump, who has been adamant that he did not want to do anything that could be characterized as a Medicaid cut, has also endorsed the policy.

But despite the broad embrace of work requirements, the legislation notably delays implementation until January 2029, after the next presidential election.

But the legislation also ratchets up paperwork requirements across the program, by allowing states to check the income and residency of beneficiaries more often, and by permitting them to terminate coverage for people who do not respond promptly. The use of such strategies had been curtailed under a regulation published during the Biden administration.

An analysis of the paperwork change published by the Congressional Budget Office last week suggested that it would cause 2.3 million people to lose Medicaid coverage, many poor older and disabled people who are also enrolled in Medicare but use Medicaid to cover co-payments they cannot afford. Because this population is at special risk, the budget office found, the policy would cause only 600,000 more Americans to lose any form of health insurance, but it would cause many more to have trouble paying for medical care.

The bill would also require Medicaid beneficiaries who earn more than the federal poverty limit — around $15,650 for a single person — to pay higher co-payments for doctor visits. Typically, Medicaid requires very limited cost sharing from its beneficiaries, given their low incomes. The legislation would require co-payments of $35 for many medical services.

Democrats in Congress immediately assailed the package as an attack on health coverage for vulnerable populations.

“In no uncertain terms, millions of Americans will lose their health care coverage, hospitals will close, seniors will not be able to access the care they need, and premiums will rise for millions of people if this bill passes,” Representative Frank Pallone of New Jersey, the top Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee, said in a statement.

The bill also takes direct aim at a handful of states controlled by Democrats that fund health coverage for undocumented immigrants, who are barred under the law from enrolling in Medicaid. The legislation would reduce federal funding for all childless adults without disabilities to 80 percent from 90 percent if the state subsidized coverage for such people. The change would mean significant funding cuts to states including California, New York and Washington unless they eliminated their state programs that enroll undocumented people.

The legislation includes numerous other small changes to Medicaid, including one to prevent owners of expensive homes from obtaining nursing home coverage, another barring coverage of gender-affirming care for transgender minors and several provisions meant to purge the program’s rolls of ineligible immigrants and people who have died.

One provision is aimed squarely at reducing federal money for Planned Parenthood. The bill would prevent Medicaid from funding health providers that also offer abortion services. House Republicans inserted similar language into their unsuccessful legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act — commonly known as Obamacare — in 2017.

The bill would also make numerous changes to enrollment processes for people who buy their own insurance coverage in Obamacare marketplaces. The legislation would shorten enrollment periods, tighten income verification, restrict access for immigrants in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and make it harder for some people to automatically renew coverage at the end of the year.

Trump's Upcoming Week

Trump in the Middle East

Trump will tour the Gulf this week. He’s looking for business deals.

America’s dominance over A.I. chips will be a powerful source of leverage in those talks.

Saudi Arabia has promised to invest $600 million in the U.S. over Trump’s presidency. Trump wants $1 trillion. Economists say neither sum is realistic, Vivian Nereim writes.

More on the Trump Administration

Top buyers of a Trump family crypto coin could win a private dinner with the president and a White House tour. Some buyers said they hope for a chance to influence policy.

Dozens of white South Africans, granted refugee status by Trump, are on their way to the U.S. They claim to have been victims of discrimination.

Dartmouth is the only Ivy League university that has avoided Trump’s retribution. The school’s president has been careful.

U.S.-China Trade Talks



Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Jean-Christophe Bott/Keystone, via Associated Press


After a weekend of meetings in Geneva, the U.S. and China said they would temporarily cut the tariffs they have imposed on each other while they continue negotiations.

The U.S. said its tariffs on Chinese goods would be 30 percent, instead of 145 percent. China’s rate on American goods will be 10 percent, down from 125 percent.

The announcement delighted stock markets around the world.

US Air Travel: Flying Blind?


Newark Liberty International Airport Dakota Santiago for The New York Times

By Kate Kelly

I’m an investigative reporter in Washington, D.C.

It has been a scary few months for air travel.

Faltering technology in the air traffic control hub that watches over Newark Liberty International Airport has caused the radar system to fail at least twice in recent weeks. Airplanes have bumped wings in San Francisco and Washington, D.C.

And a number of commercial flights have aborted landings at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport so far this month. On one occasion, it was because an Army helicopter was flying nearby — just months after a plane and a helicopter collided in the same airspace, killing 67 people.

The Federal Aviation Administration’s air traffic employees watch over nearly three million passengers and more than 45,000 flights per day. But the technology they rely on is in some cases wildly outdated. And it’s tough to find people who can operate it.

Glitchy systems

Air traffic controllers rely on two essential things: radar screens, which provide a visual representation of what’s going on in the air, and radio communications, which allow them to talk with pilots.

In certain cases, copper wiring, first developed in the 19th century, is used to transmit data from one place to another. Some systems still rely on floppy disks and compact discs. Flight records are occasionally printed out on slips of paper rather than relayed electronically.

The result is a hodgepodge network of software, parts and wires. Sometimes it works seamlessly; other times a single clipped wire takes out a controller’s radar entirely, leaving pilots with no means to be seen by the people who are supposed to be keeping them out of harm’s way.

Officials said that archaic technology was to blame for the recent outages at Newark. On April 28, some of Newark’s controllers lost both radar and radio. Though the outage lasted just 90 seconds, its effects cascaded for days, causing more than 1,800 flights to be delayed or canceled. Additional equipment outages followed on Friday and again yesterday morning.

Source: Flightradar24 | By The New York Times


Newer technology would make a difference, controllers and government officials say. And Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has called for upgrades. But his modernization effort, announced on Thursday, needs approval from Congress. And it must be installed without disturbing the delicate network of flight monitoring that guides pilots through U.S. airspace 24 hours a day.

Low staffing

Another part of the problem is that the F.A.A.’s air traffic control hubs are chronically understaffed, especially in busy and complex airspaces like New York and Washington. Newark Airport’s work force is no exception.

Last year, in an effort to bulk up the F.A.A.’s staff, the agency moved 24 Newark controllers from their longtime base in Westbury, N.Y., to Philadelphia. The agency hoped the lower cost of living in that area might attract workers. But the relocation has so far been a bust, at least in part because of the equipment problems that are sidelining some workers.

After the April 28 outage at Newark, the controllers were so shaken that they are now taking time off to cope with the stress, people familiar with the matter told me. A trainee who had been in the room during the outage was discovered trembling in a hallway afterward. A controller cried when he got to his car.

The F.A.A. recently raised the starting salary for attendees of its controller training program, and it is offering a special $10,000 bonus to graduates who opt to work in “hard to staff” locations. But the preparations for overseeing an airspace like Newark’s are lengthy, controllers say; it takes years to train a newer employee, and a year or more for an experienced one.
Is it safe to fly?

As the summer travel season looms, a fix feels increasingly urgent.

Of course, flying in the U.S. is still far safer than driving in a car. Thousands of pilots, controllers and other safety workers keep passengers out of harm’s way every day. The midair collision in Washington in January was devastating, but it was also the first accident of that scale since 2009.

But considering the technological shortcomings, the uncertain path to making upgrades and the painful toll those glitches are taking on the controllers, it’s understandable that passengers flying in or out of Newark might now be taking a hard look at their upcoming flight plans.


Zelensky Agrees to Talks With Russia, After Trump Intervention

Ukrainian president said he would be waiting for Putin at peace talks proposed by the Russian president in Istanbul

By James Marson and Jane Lytvynenko

Updated May 11, 2025 4:33 pm ET

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said Moscow is ready for direct peace talks with Ukraine. PHOTO: GAVRIIL GRIGOROV/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky challenged Vladimir Putin to meet him in Istanbul this week, after President Trump swung behind the Russian president’s offer of talks before a cease-fire.

Zelensky said he would be waiting for Putin in Turkey on Thursday, raising the stakes amid a flurry of diplomatic exchanges and brinkmanship over the weekend where both sides sought to balance not making any significant concessions, with placating Trump, who has demanded an end to the three-year war.

Putin didn’t immediately respond to Zelensky’s offer, which goes beyond the scope of the Russian leader’s suggestion of reviving peace talks among subordinates that petered out in 2022. Putin has repeatedly expressed disdain for Zelensky and questioned his legitimacy.

Trump’s support of the Russian president’s proposal, a switch in his position, had initially appeared to upend European efforts to bring pressure to bear on Russia to halt its war and hand a diplomatic victory to Putin. Putin a day earlier had rebuffed a cease-fire ultimatum from Kyiv and its Western allies,

Treasury Sec Bessent Hails ‘Productive’ U.S.-China Trade Talks

Treasury secretary cites progress and promises more details Monday; Beijing says the two sides agreed to start a formal negotiation process

By Brian Schwartz and Lingling Wei

Updated May 11, 2025 4:19 pm ET

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, left, and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer were in Geneva for trade talks with China. PHOTO: VALENTIN FLAURAUD/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES

Key Points

U.S. and China concluded high-level trade discussions in Geneva that U.S. officials said were ‘productive’.

Beijing said both sides will establish an ‘economic and trade consultation mechanism’ for recurring discussions.

Trump wants fairer trade with Beijing and to curb China’s role in fentanyl trafficking into the U.S.

GENEVA—Officials from the U.S. and China wrapped up their weekend, high-stakes trade talks, with Beijing saying the two sides agreed to start a formal negotiation process and Washington touting progress toward a deal.

The talks spanned at least eight hours Saturday and several hours Sunday, setting the stage for a potential thawing of trade relations between the world’s two largest economies. Since starting his second term, Trump has slapped 145% tariffs on Chinese goods while Beijing has hit back with 125% duties on American products. That has led bilateral trade to nearly dry up, heightening inflationary pressure in the U.S. and threatening to plunge China into a deep recession.

May 11, 2025

Can King Charles Heal a Royal Family Crisis Before It’s Too Late?

Prince Harry’s desperate plea to reconcile with his father highlighted a rupture that could undermine the monarchy’s attempts to model unity.


By Mark Landler

Reporting from LondonMay 11, 2025Updated 3:09 p.m. ET

King Charles III was busy last week marking the 80th anniversary of the Allied victory over Nazi Germany and preparing to fly to Canada to open its Parliament later this month. But his public schedule was eclipsed yet again by a highly publicized eruption from his estranged younger son, Prince Harry.

It has become a familiar pattern for the 76-year-old monarch. Two years after his coronation, his reign is shaping up as both eventful and oddly unchanging in its core narrative: that of a beleaguered father managing a messy brood.

Harry’s emotional plea to be reconciled with his family — made in a recent interview with the BBC, in which he mused about how long his cancer-stricken father had left to live — resurfaced bitter ruptures within the royal family, which has yet to find its footing in the still-fledgling Carolean era.

“There is an overhang in the way we see Charles’s reign,” said Ed Owens, a historian who writes about the British monarchy. “It hasn’t really gotten going, nor are we sure how long it will last.”

To be sure, the king has done a lot. Despite undergoing weekly treatments for cancer diagnosed last year, he traveled to France, Australia, Poland and Italy. He found time to curate a playlist for Apple Music (Kylie Minogue and Bob Marley feature), played host at state banquets and posed for portraits.

But Harry’s comments, which came after a legal defeat over his security arrangements in Britain, dragged attention back to the rift that opened in 2020 when he and his wife, Meghan, withdrew from royal life and moved to California.

ImageCatherine, Princess of Wales; William, Prince of Wales; Harry, Duke of Sussex; and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, at Windsor Castle in 2022.Credit...Pool photo by Kirsty O'Connor


Some royal watchers warn that unless Charles finds a way to heal that rift, it could define his reign, undercutting the messages of tolerance and inclusiveness that he has long championed.

“When history comes to be written about the king, this will reflect badly on him,” said Peter Hunt, a former royal correspondent for the BBC. “He represents an institution that is about family, unity and fostering forgiveness. His role is to bring people together, and yet he can’t bring people together on his doorstep.”

Buckingham Palace has declined to comment on the king’s relationship with his son. But it pushed back on Harry’s contention in the BBC interview that his father could have done more to spare him the loss of automatic, publicly funded police protection when he visits Britain.

“All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion,” a spokesman for the palace said in an unusually tart statement.

An appeals court ruled on May 2 that a government committee had acted properly in denying Harry automatic protection after he stopped being a working royal. He said he does not think it is safe to bring his wife and children home without such security.

The palace appealed to journalists not to focus on the family drama during a week dedicated to V-E Day commemorations. Far from calming the waters, Mr. Hunt said, that had the effect of keeping the spotlight on Harry longer than necessary.

Editors’ Picks
‘Paris Here I Come!’

How Much Are We Paying for Newsletters? $50, $100 … How About $3,000 a Year.

There’s No ‘Undo’ Button for Extinct Species




“It’s a private issue but they are using the full weight of the institution to respond to him,” Mr. Hunt said.

Image
King Charles, Queen Camilla, William, Prince of Wales, and Catherine, Princess of Wales, marking the 80th Anniversary of V-E Day at Westminster Abbey, on Thursday.Credit...Pool photo by Julian Simmonds

Harry remains estranged from his older brother, Prince William, as well as his father, which adds to the portrait of a family divided and diminished. When the royals gathered on the balcony of Buckingham Palace to watch a flyover of war planes last week, their ranks were noticeably sparse.

The king’s younger brother, Prince Andrew, is still in internal exile, following the scandal over his ties to the disgraced sex predator Jeffrey Epstein. Andrew’s history also resurfaced in recent weeks with the death of Virginia Giuffre, a woman introduced to him by Mr. Epstein, with whom he later settled a sexual abuse lawsuit. Her family said she died by suicide in Australia.

For William, the loss of Harry and Andrew, as well as his father’s illness, has thrust him into a more conspicuously public role.

He met with President Trump last year at the reopening of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris. He rode on a tank during a visit to British troops in Estonia. And he represented his father at the funeral of Pope Francis last month, which came only days after Charles and his wife, Queen Camilla, met Francis at the Vatican.

“William has sometimes been seen as work-shy, but we see him gravitating toward bigger, more media-friendly events,” said Mr. Owens, the historian. “He’s burnishing his reputation as a statesman.”

William has put much of his energy into a program to tackle homelessness in six cities across Britain and Northern Ireland. Like his father, he continues to be active on climate change, though Mr. Owens said both had modulated their voices as net-zero targets have become politically fraught.

Image
Prince William discussing a supportive housing project for people with mental health issues, in February. His father’s illness and the estrangement of his brother have thrust him into a greater public role. Credit...Pool photo by Henry Nicholls


The heir to the throne made perhaps his biggest splash with the British public when he offered astute sports commentary last month before a Champions League game pitting his favorite soccer club, Aston Villa, against Paris Saint-Germain. One of the hosts, Rio Ferdinand, joked that he could take his job.

The job that William does not want, at least for now, is his father’s. But fears over the king’s health have made talk of succession inescapable. In late March, Charles was briefly hospitalized after a reaction to his medication. The palace insisted it was a minor bump on the road to recovery, but it set off alarm bells at British broadcasters, for whom the passing of a monarch sets in motion substantial coverage.

Nothing in the king’s calendar suggests he is slowing down. If anything, he has embraced his duties with a zeal that royal watchers say is either evidence of a robust recovery or the mark of a man who knows he has limited time.

Trump Administration Updates: Judge Pauses Plans for Mass Layoffs

Updated May 10, 2025

Of all the lawsuits challenging President Trump’s vision to dramatically scale back the form and function of the federal government, the one now paused by a federal judge in California is poised to have the broadest effect yet.Credit...Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times

Where Things Stand

Mass layoffs: A federal judge in California called for a two-week pause in the Trump administration’s mass layoff plans, barring two dozen agencies from moving forward with the largest phase of the president’s downsizing efforts, which the judge said was illegal without Congress’s authorization. Read more ›


Immigration: A top aide to President Trump, Stephen Miller, told reporters that the administration was considering whether to suspend the right of migrants to challenge their detentions in court. “The Constitution is clear,” he said outside the White House, arguing that the right, known as a writ of habeas corpus, “could be suspended in time of invasion.” Read more ›


Safety board firings: Mr. Trump has moved to fire three Democratic members of the agency that monitors the safety of products like cribs, toys and electronics. The members of the agency, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, assert that their removals are illegal, and similar firings at independent agencies established by Congress are being fought in the courts. Read more ›


Trade war: Ahead of trade talks with China this weekend, Mr. Trump said he was open to lowering his tariffs on goods from China to 80 percent, from 145 percent. He also told reporters he would not be disappointed if a deal is not reached right away, arguing that not doing business is also a good deal for the United States. Read more ›