 |
| The mother of an Israeli soldier, Tsafrir Bar-Or, mourned during his funeral near Tel Aviv on Monday. Credit Daniel Bar-on/Reuters |
N.Y. TIMES
Israeli leaders have stressed two points in selling their Gaza Strip ground invasion internationally and at home: that they embraced all cease-fire proposals and that troops are targeting tunnels used by Palestinian militants to infiltrate their territory.
Now, with the lopsided death toll mounting on both sides — more than 550 Gazans, 25 Israeli soldiers and two Israeli civilians — world leaders are demanding an immediate halt to the hostilities. But the operation has uncovered more tunnels than expected, officials said, and there were two more deadly incursions Monday, making many Israelis say they were reluctant to leave a job half-finished.
That has Israel struggling with a more distilled version of the dilemma it has faced in repeated rounds against Hamas, the Islamist movement that dominates Gaza. If it stops now, it faces the prospect of a newly embittered enemy retaining the capacity to attack. But if it stays the course, it is liable to kill many more civilians and face international condemnation.
“Israel must not agree to any proposal for a cease-fire until the tunnels are eliminated,” Gilad Erdan, the right-wing minister of communications, said during a hospital visit to wounded soldiers.
But Tzipi Livni, the centrist justice minister, told reporters that demilitarizing Gaza could be tackled after an agreement, and that “to cease the fire, stop the fire, this is the main goal right now.”
Israelis have increasingly floated the idea of an international arrangement modeled on the successful effort to remove chemical weapons from Syria. In this case, it would involve having international observers help to identify and eliminate tunnels and the rest of Gaza’s arsenal, but many experts say they find it hard to imagine Hamas would consider such a condition for a cease-fire.
As Secretary of State John Kerry and the United Nations secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, landed in Cairo on Monday night seeking a cease-fire, analysts set low expectations. The Hamas-Israel feud is in many ways trickier and outside the core Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israelis feel they withdrew from Gaza only to allow it to become a launching pad for rockets, and Hamas refuses to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist.
For each, eradicating the other is the goal — not a two-state solution.
This is the third bloody battle between Israel and Hamas in six years, and both previous cease-fire agreements simply restored quiet without touching topics central to the broader conflict, like the borders of a future Palestinian state or the fate of Jerusalem and refugees.
 |
| Israeli soldiers taking up positions on Monday near the Gaza border after militants infiltrated southern Israel through tunnels. Credit Jack Guez/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images |
Ismail Haniya, until recently the Hamas prime minister, said in a speech Monday that fighting would continue until the movement’s demands were met, including the release of prisoners freed in a 2011 exchange for an abducted Israeli soldier and who were recently rearrested — something most experts find it hard to imagine Israel would consider.
“We’ll never go back to the period before the aggression. We’ll never go back to the slow death,” Mr. Haniya said in a televised address. “Gaza will be the graveyard for the invaders, as it always was in history.”
Israel seized Gaza from Egypt in the 1967 war, but withdrew all its settlers and soldiers in 2005 in an evacuation that still roils the society. Right-wingers use the last decade of intermittent fire from Gaza — it continued Monday, with the military’s count of rockets launched since the start of the operation topping 2,000 — as a prime argument against any further withdrawal from occupied territory.
Hamas has ruled there since its bloody rout of the Palestinian Authority in 2007, and Israel bars its citizens from entry, making the tiny coastal enclave crowded with 1.7 million people loom as a frightening enemy in Israeli imagination.
A senior Israeli military official said Sunday that the current operation had already wrought more damage on Hamas than Operation Cast Lead in 2008 and 2009, and the Palestinian death toll is more than triple that of 2012’s Pillar of Defense.
Monday morning, the Abu Jameh family pulled 26 bodies, 19 of them children, from the rubble of their home near the southern Gaza town of Khan Younis, the largest toll from a single strike since the battle began July 8. Four people were killed at Al Aqsa Martyrs Hospital, the main one serving the center of the crowded coastal enclave. An airstrike Monday night destroyed the top five floors of an apartment building called Al-Salam — the Peace — in central Gaza City, an area that had been seen as a safe haven, killing 11.
Witnesses said Israeli forces also fatally shot Mahmoud Hatem al Shawmreh, 29, in one of several clashes Monday night with Palestinian protesters in the West Bank. Seven Israeli soldiers died in combat Monday, making the total over four days two-and-a-half times the number killed in the three-week Cast Lead. Four were killed inside Israeli territory, along with 10 Gaza gunmen who penetrated the border through tunnels, according to a military statement, at least the fifth such incursion reported by the military since Thursday.
Moshe Ya’alon, Israel’s defense minister, has said the forces might be able to destroy all the tunnels into Israeli territory within a few days — which may be as long as it takes to push through a cease-fire. Momentum was gathering behind an Egyptian initiative first presented a week ago, but Hamas does not trust the new government in Cairo, which defines it as an enemy.
Mr. Ban of the United Nations suggested in Cairo Monday night that a humanitarian pause might be the best path to a more durable cease-fire.
“The violence must stop, it must stop now,” Mr. Ban said at a news conference with Egypt’s foreign minister. Afterward, “we cannot claim victory by simply returning matters to where they stood before the last terrible bloodshed,” he added.
Unlike in previous Gaza-Israel negotiations, President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority is also trying to forge a role, but statements from his camp have been all over the map. A Palestinian spokesman in Geneva last week called Hamas’s rocket-firing a “crime against humanity” — the same words Mr. Abbas used Sunday to characterize Israel’s killing of some 67 Palestinians in the east Gaza City neighborhood Shejaiya.
That, along with his backing of the Egyptian proposal and condemnation of last month’s kidnapping and killing of three Israeli teenagers, has eroded Mr. Abbas’s support in the West Bank.
But Shlomo Brom, director of the program on Israeli-Palestinian relations at Tel Aviv University’s Institute for National Security Studies, said that Mr. Abbas’s role — based on the pact his Palestine Liberation Organization signed with Hamas in April — is the most promising path to lasting change in Gaza.