December 7, 2017



Thomas fire: Thousands of acres burn in Ventura County



Four wildfires are raging across California ... in December

The Skirball Fire, which started near Interstate 405, is consuming mansions in the expensive area. Rupert Murdoch's vineyard estate is dangerously close to the fast moving fire and was completely covered in smoke as of Wednesday afternoon
  • It’s December, and wildfires are still raging through Southern California, extending what is already the state’s worst fire season on record. [Vox / Umair Irfan]
  • No deaths have been reported, but four wildfires near Los Angeles have burned tens of thousands of acres and forced at least 120,000 people to evacuate their homes. [CNBC / Michael Sheetz
  • The fires have burned hundreds of homes and other buildings, and the flames are wreaking havoc on people’s commutes, as they’ve jumped over highways. One even spread all the way to the Pacific Ocean. [LA Times / Ruben Vives, Laura Nelson, Sarah Parvini, Matt Hamilton, and Sonali Kohli
  • Firefighters work to save burning houses along Linda Flora Drive during the Skirball Fire in Los Angeles. Forecasters say that the fire is likely to continue spreading 
  • These fires come just a month after devastating blazes in Northern California’s wine region burned homes and wineries to the ground. [Washington Post / Mark Berman and Eli Rosenberg
  • Fires in December are rare; these ones are being driven by unusually strong Santa Ana winds, which are gusting up to 70 miles per hour and propelling flames over the hilly landscape. The winds are making it especially difficult for firefighters to contain the blaze. [Vox / Umair Irfan
  • Part of the reason California’s fires are so bad and so much property is being lost is because highly populated areas are also areas where fire danger is bad. And so far, development in these areas shows no signs of stopping. [Vox / Umair Irfan
  • Flames from the Thomas wildfire leap perilously close to traffic on Highway 101, which is north of the badly affected Ventura area of Southern California
The Thomas Fire - the largest of the five fires - is four times the size of Manhattan.
It's growing at an acre per second - meaning it would envelop Manhattan's Central Park in just 15 minutes. 

Nearly 200,000 people have been told to evacuate their homes. 

At least 184 structures have been destroyed - 150 by the Thomas Fire. 

The fires are being stoked by the hot, dry Santa Ana winds - which are averaging 50-70mph, but could have gusts of 80mph. They haven't been this numerous or this fast in 10 years.

Terrifying: Paris Hilton had to have her pets evacuated as she gives her thanks to the many fire fighters working hard to save property and protect lives 




Can Democrats win back the
House in 2018? It’ll be tough.


The party currently holds 194 seats, 24 short of what it needs to take back control of the chamber from Republicans. Three possible paths to the majority include winning in districts Hillary Clinton won in 2016, capitalizing on GOP retirements and targeting the districts where House races were closest in the last election cycle.

WASHINGTON POST

December 3, 2017

Flynn Pleads Guilty to Lying to the F.B.I.



Jared Kushner ordered Mike Flynn to contact the Russians
Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump's son-in-law, directed Michael Flynn, then a Trump adviser, to contact Russian officials around December 29, NBC News reported on Friday, citing two people familiar with the matter. The order was to discuss a United Nations resolution on Israel, the broadcaster said. CNN made a similar claim. The stunning development puts Kushner directly in the crosshairs of Robert Mueller's probe, and comes after Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI in a deal which makes him the special counsel's star witness. Kushner's name emerged after a series of court documents disclosed that Flynn was told to speak to the Russians by 'a senior member' of Trump's transition who was then at Mar-a-Lago. Flynn said he will provide 'full cooperation' to Special Counsel Robert Mueller in his Russia probe after his stunning guilty plea in federal court Friday morning.




  • Flynn lied to the FBI, according to prosecutors, about his conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in December 2016. In one case, Flynn asked Kislyak to “refrain from escalating the situation” in response to Obama-imposed sanctions. On a different topic, Flynn asked Kislyak to vote down a UN resolution condemning Israeli settlements. [NYT / Eileen Sullivan, Adam Goldman, and Michael D. Shear]
  • Flynn pleaded guilty to one count of lying to the FBI, which carries a maximum five-year prison sentence. Flynn is also reportedly cooperating with Mueller. Now might be time for the White House to start worrying. [ Vox / Andrew Prokop, Zack Beauchamp, and Alex Ward
  • It’s not clear at this point what form Flynn’s cooperation will take. The Russian contacts Flynn lied about took place during the presidential transition, not the election. [Vox / Andrew Prokop]
  • Yet Flynn is getting off pretty easy — just one felony count — which means he might have some very valuable information for Mueller and company. As one legal expert said, “I’m confident Flynn is singing like a bird to Mueller.” [Vox / Sean Illing
  • But there is at least one guy who should be worrying: Trump adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner. He is reportedly the unnamed “very senior member” of the presidential transition team who instructed Flynn to call the Russians and get them to vote against the UN resolution on Israeli settlements. [Vox / Andrew Prokop
  • Four people have gone down in the Mueller investigation so far. Two — Flynn and Trump campaign aid George Papadopoulos — have both pleaded guilty to not telling the truth to the FBI about Russia contacts. Which brings up the question: Why are all these people lying to federal investigators? [Axios / Jonathan Swan
  • This is a lot for a Friday. But here’s how Flynn’s downfall fits into the unfolding saga of possible Trump-Russia collusion. [Vox / Andrew Prokop

November 29, 2017



Bernie Sanders’ single payer plan is here. Think of it as an opening bid.


WASHINGTON POST


Bernie Sanders released his latest single payer health care plan, and while there are some small differences between this one and what he has proposed in the past, the biggest difference is that this time, he’s got lots of company. Fifteen Democratic senators are co-sponsoring his bill, including most of those considering running for president in 2020.
Support for some kind of universal coverage is now the consensus position among Democrats. And Sanders’ single payer plan is the one that has gotten the most attention, so it’s going to be the one against which other plans are measured.
But we have to understand this plan for what it really is: an opening bid. While he won’t say so himself, I doubt even Sanders believes that something in this form could pass through Congress. Even so, it represents an important strategic shift for the Democratic Party.
 here are the basics on what Sanders’ plan would do, based on a summary released by his office:
  • It establishes an (almost) true single payer system in which private and employer-based insurance is replaced by an expansion of Medicare to include nearly every American.
  • It does so over four years, lowering the Medicare eligibility age to 55 and insuring all children in the first year, then expanding the plan to include all citizens over the following three years.
  • It includes areas of coverage not currently offered by traditional Medicare, including dental, vision, and hearing aids.
  • It eliminates nearly all co-pays, coinsurance, and deductibles.
  • It allows the expanded Medicare system to negotiate drug prices, which Medicare is currently forbidden from doing.
  • It does not include nursing home coverage, which would continue to be covered under Medicaid, nor does it eliminate the VA or the Indian Health Service.
  • It would pay providers at current Medicare rates, which are lower than private insurance but higher than Medicaid.
This is a maximalist demand. It essentially says, “My plan is: everything. Not just covering everybody, but covering everything, without co-pays or deductibles. Is that realistic? Not really. But that may not be a problem.
One of the complaints people on the left had about both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama — in general, but specifically on health care — is that they gave away too much too quickly, often before negotiations even started. They were too focused on what Republicans or interest groups would never accept, so they moved their opening proposals three steps to the center, leaving the final negotiated solution much more conservative than it had to be. It would have been far better, this critique goes, if they had opened with a much more liberal proposal, then slowly given some ground and eventually arrived at a more liberal compromise.
North Korea claims nuclear statehood with missile test

 North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has bragged that his country has achieved full nuclear statehood after successfully testing a new missile capable of hitting anywhere in the United States. The country abruptly ended a 10-week pause in its weapons testing on Tuesday when it fired off its most powerful intercontinental ballistic missile yet. It poses a new challenge for President Donald Trump who has vowed not to let North Korea develop nuclear missiles that can hit the US mainland. After watching the successful launch of the new type ICBM Hwasong-15, Kim Jong Un boasted about its success, ... US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis warned that North Korea now has the ability to hit 'everywhere in the world' and that the latest missile test went 'higher, frankly, than any previous shot they have taken.' The Pentagon said the test missile traveled about 620 miles and landed within 200 nautical miles of Japan's coast. One physicist said the missile appeared to have a realistic range of just over 8,000 miles, which means Washington D.C. is now in range of Kim's attacks - and that Australia and Europe are too. 

NY Times: David Wright, a scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the missile performed better than the two fired in July, and exhibited a potential range of more than 8,000 miles, able to reach Washington or any other part of the continental United States.However, Dr. Wright noted that in an effort to increase the vehicle’s range, the North Koreans might have fitted it with a mock payload that weighed little or next to nothing. So the distance traveled, while impressive, does not necessarily translate into a working intercontinental ballistic missile that could deliver a thermonuclear warhead.


For all the evidence of technical advancements, a senior White House official said the significance of the launch should not be overstated, given the number of missile tests North Korea has carried out this year. The White House had expected some form of retaliation after it put the North back on its list of state sponsors of terrorism last week.Mr. Trump, officials said, will stick to his policy of rallying nations to apply economic pressure on North Korea, backed up by the threat of military action. In a statement, Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson condemned the launch. But he added, “Diplomatic options remain viable and open, for now.”


November 18, 2017



At Snopes, a Peek Down the Right-Wing Rabbit Holes

Fake news is a perfect marriage of corrupt capitalism (make-a-buck pranksters) and corrupt constitutionalism (people who lie under protection of the First Amendment).




MICHAEL TOMASKY, DAILY BEAST




The Democrats Have an Even Worse White Working Class Problem Than We Thought

Here’s why we were all so shocked last election night: a heavily Republican demographic was dramatically undercounted.






MICHAEL TOMASKY, DAILY BEAST




The Opioid epidemic and the truth about  deaths of despair.

WASHINGTON POST

Medicaid isn’t the problem (and isn’t the solution). Critics of Medicaid argue that the program enables the epidemic by paying for prescription opioids. In fact, Princeton University researchers Janet Currie and Molly Schnell calculate that only 8 percent of all opioid prescriptions from January 2006 to March 2015 were paid for by Medicaid, based on data from QuintilesIMS, a leading health-care information company.

Medicaid can help addicts by providing a range of evidence-based therapies. This is correct and, like many others, we think treatment is a good idea. As such, we are also concerned about the effects that reductions in Medicaid could have on the epidemic. But Medicaid proponents often greatly overstate what can be expected from treatment in general, and Medicaid in particular. Many addicts deny their addiction and either do not seek or do not adhere to treatment once started. “Evidence-based” typically means there has been a randomized, controlled trial that has demonstrated effectiveness. But trials include only those who seek treatment — and say nothing about those who avoid it. A trial is deemed successful when the treatment is proved better than nothing (or at least a placebo) — even if only a few people end up benefiting from it.
It is not all about opioids. Policymakers often speak as if the epidemic will be over as soon as we tackle both legal and illegal opioids. Better control of opioids is essential, but, even without opioid deaths, there would still be as many or more deaths from suicide and liver diseases. Opioids are like guns handed out in a suicide ward; they have certainly made the total epidemic much worse, but they are not the cause of the underlying depression. We suspect that deaths of despair among those without a university degree are primarily the result of a 40-year stagnation of median real wages and a long-term decline in the number of well-paying jobs for those without a bachelor’s degree. Falling labor force participation, sluggish wage growth, and associated dysfunctional marriage and child-rearing patterns have undermined the meaning of working people’s lives as well.
The crisis has hit men and women about equally. There are competing myths that women (or men) have faced the greater brunt of the epidemic. In fact, the increase in deaths of despair has been similar for men and women. It is true that women are less likely to kill themselves than men, and they have lower death rates throughout life. As a result, the same increase in deaths among both sexes translates into a larger percentage increase for women. But the numbers of additional deaths remain similar. A focus on men appears to reflect a prejudice that the social pathologies connected to the epidemic — drinking and drugging — are primarily seen in men. That has led some to believe that men are more prone to deaths of despair, but again, the data do not support that claim.
Rural Americans are not alone in this crisis. While mortality rates are somewhat lower in the suburbs of large cities than elsewhere, deaths of despair have risen in parallel in all levels of urbanization defined by the Census Bureau, from inner cities to rural areas. They have increased for middle-aged whites — not blacks or Hispanics — in every state between 1999 and 2015, with deaths concentrated among those who do not have a four-year college degree. This is a statement of fact, not a claim that more education would bring the deaths under control.
There is no simple policy solution to this epidemic. In the short run, we need to develop less tolerance for the use of opioids — both legal painkillers and illegal forms of the drug, such as heroin and black-market fentanyl. Perhaps local communities have the best chance of doing so.
But the long-run solution is much harder to attain. We need higher wages and better jobs for working people. The past 40 years suggest that is a far more difficult goal to attain.

November 12, 2017

Diana Nyad at 61, during training for a swim from Key West, Fla., to Cuba. CreditJeffery Salter/Redux

Diana Nyad: My Life After Sexual Assault



NY TIMES


Here I was, a strong-willed young athlete. There he was, a charismatic pillar of the community. But I’m the one who, all these many years later, at the age of 68, no matter how happy and together I may be, continues to deal with the rage and the shame that comes with being silenced.
My particular case mirrors countless others. I was 14. A naïve 14, in 1964. I don’t think I could have given you a definition of intercourse.
My swimming coach was in many ways the father I had always yearned for. I met him when I was 10, and those first four years were marked by a strong mentor-student bond. He repeatedly told me I had all the talents to one day rock the world. I worshiped my coach. His word was The Word. I built a pedestal for him and gazed up at the center of my universe.
That summer, our school hosted the state championships. It was a big deal, and I was a star in the middle of it all. In between the afternoon preliminaries and the night finals, bursting with confidence, I went over to Coach’s house for a nap. This was normal: Coach’s house, his family, his kids were all part of the swim team’s daily milieu.
I was dead asleep in the master bedroom when it happened. Out of nowhere, he was on top of me. He yanked my suit down. He grabbed at and drooled onto my breasts. He hyperventilated and moaned. I didn’t breathe for perhaps two full minutes, my body locked in an impenetrable flex. My arms trembled, pinned to my sides. He pleaded with me to open my legs, but they were pressed hard together. If breath gives us force, that day I could feel the strength in my body from the polar opposite — from not breathing. He ejaculated on my stomach, my athletic torso I was so proud of now suddenly violated with this strange and foul stuff.
As he slinked out of the room, I gasped for air, as if I had just been held underwater for those two minutes. I vomited onto the floor.
That night I was not of this world. Teammates had to prompt me to get onto the blocks. I hadn’t heard the announcer’s voice. In the end, we won the team title, but while the team was cheering and laughing, I plunged down to the floor of the diving well. My young world had just been capsized and I was very much alone in my confusion and fear. And I screamed into the abyss of dark water: “This is not going to ruin my life!”
I might have defied ruin, but my young life changed dramatically that day. That first savage episode signaled the beginning of years of covert molestation. Throughout the rest of high school I was a loner, not a natural role for me. No longer did I hold the unofficial title of “most disciplined” on the team, the first to practice each dawn. I couldn’t chance being alone with Coach again. I sat through classes, distracted by an image of hacking my breasts off with a razor blade. Overnight, I began going through life a solitary soldier. I didn’t need anybody, for anything.
Mine is an age-old scenario. Coaches and priests and doctors and scout leaders and stepfathers and, yes, movie producers, have been preying on those they are supposedly mentoring for far too long. And this isn’t the first time I’ve told my story. I first gave voice to the details of the years of humiliation when I was 21; the sense of power it gave me was immediate.
For me, being silenced was a punishment equal to the molestation. Legal prosecution proved time and time again to be futile, but I could at least regain my own dignity each time I uttered my truth. I’ve been speaking out, loud and strong, for nearly five decades now. It has been crucial to my own health. It has energized others to speak out, too. And I will continue to tell my story until all girls and women find their own voice.
I didn’t suffer the Holocaust. I’ve never been through the horrors of war. I don’t paint my youth as tragic, yet I spent every day of my high school years terrified that it would be yet another day that he would summon me after practice, for a humiliating ride in his car or a disgusting hour in the motel down the street. I wasn’t studying with my friends. I wasn’t home with my family. I was clenching my teeth, squeezing my legs tightly together, waiting to breathe again. And I was silent. Always silent. He assured me that what we shared was something special, that my life would collapse if anybody else knew, that this was magic between us. Our special secret.
One spring day, the elite of our team had a light practice, preparing to leave the next day for the nationals in Oklahoma. We were scheduled to spend a few minutes each in private consultation with Coach in his office, to talk over strategies for our races.
When I headed in for my session, I had zero fear of a molestation episode. We were on campus. The other swimmers were chatting right outside.
No sooner had I begun expressing my worry about not having tapered enough, when he flew from behind his desk to behind my chair. He ripped my suit down and grabbed my breasts. He swiftly dragged me into a little bathroom in his office and pushed me up against a single mattress that was propped up in the shower stall. My body knew its response; I went rigid. He pleaded with me to open up, but my survival system was gripped with fear. His eyes glazed with pleasure as he called me his “little bitch.” I recoil at the word to this day. He bucked, panted, drooled and, once again, ejaculated onto my stomach. My breath was short, in my throat, as he bounced back into the office and called out for the next swimmer to come in. Mortified as I exited past that kid, I aimlessly walked out to nowhere. The self-hatred, the welling shame, was all-consuming. I wasn’t an elite athlete of my school, heading off to the United States Nationals the next day. I was inconsequential. Utterly inconsequential.
These molestations were the cornerstone of my teenage life. I studied. I had friends. I won awards. On the outside, I was a bold, overly confident, swaggering success. But the veneer was thin. On the inside, I lived the perpetual trauma of being held down, called misogynist names and ordered to be quiet. I wanted to be anywhere but here, anybody but me.
I was 21 when I told someone the whole horrid saga for the first time. I took a weekend trip to Michigan to celebrate the birthday of my best friend from high school, and every heinous detail, every recounted word, came spewing forth. The relief was palpable. I wept. My friend cried with me, hugged me, took a long pause and said, “Well, Diana, hold on to your hat because the same thing happened to me.” The same coach. The precise same words. The mattress in the office shower stall. The same covert manipulation. The same special secret. And we soon learned that it wasn’t just the two of us. It never is.
When we confronted Coach, in front of our high school principal and the school’s lawyer, he knelt at my feet and whimpered. He said he couldn’t understand why I would falsely malign him this way. The next day he was fired. The principal told me that he had had suspicions, even reports from witnesses over the years, but that he had never caught him in the act.
At the end of all the proceedings, the principal asked me and my friend point blank whether Coach’s being fired from the school would be enough punishment for us. I took a minute to think — and said it would. Little did we know that he would jump right down to the next town and quickly be installed as head coach of a major university. Had I known this man would continue to harm more girls, had I had an inkling as to how deep the imprint of this man’s actions would run through the course of my life, I would have immediately pursued a criminal case.
Up until his death in 2014, Coach was celebrated by the coaching community, his town, his church. He made it into halls of fame and to the top of the coaching pyramid, the Olympic Games. And so is woven the fabric of the epidemic. These often charming individuals are lauded, presented with trophies for their leadership, from the piggish Weinsteins of Hollywood to the unscrupulous parental figures scattered throughout our suburbs. Statistics bear out the astonishing number of sexual abusers among us.
And therein lies the call for our speaking up. We need to construct an accurate archive of these abuses. And we need to prepare coming generations to speak up in the moment, rather than be coerced into years of mute helplessness.
Those who have found a platform to speak, and to be heard, within recent weeks have most likely forged unexpected connections as a result. Whenever I mention my case in front of a live audience, invariably women come up to me afterward and let me know that they too are survivors. They immediately command my full attention with a particularly steady gaze and they say, “The same thing happened to me — my stepfather.” Or “I’m a survivor, too.” Then we hug, long and hard. And we often find tears for each other. We connect. It’s our version of #MeToo.
One afternoon, after an appearance I made in Hilton Head, S.C., an elderly woman came toward me. Gingerly, she took both of my hands into hers, looked at me knowingly and, without saying a word, gave me a folded note. I slid it into my pocket, to read it later in private. Back in my hotel room, I read the note and called the number she had left me. She came to my room a couple of hours later.
This woman told me a story that I’ve heard many times before. Her father began molesting her when she was 3. Three. How can we begin to wrap our minds around that? He continued throughout her teenage years, using the familiar threat of shaming her and even hurting her if she told anybody. This was their special secret, he told her. Those words chilled me to the bone: their special secret.
Our conversation in my hotel room was the first time that she ever told anyone what had happened to her. She shed bitter tears, and I held her frail body, crying also for all these long years she had lived with the burden of these unspeakable events. There’s the irony. These events we have suffered are at once unspeakable and yet need to be spoken.
An interviewer once asked me, as many do, “Where did your confidence, your iron will come from?” That person didn’t know that just hours earlier the same day, I’d flown into an uncontrollable self-rage. Approaching my door, clutching several bags of groceries, I’d fumbled with the keys, lost hold of the bags and started a self-destructive rant as apples rolled down the driveway. The same words the coach had used while molesting me came screaming out at me, from my own mouth. “You little bitch!” “You worthless little ….” That wounded young person inside believes, on some cellular level, that these words sum up exactly who I am at the core.
These self-loathing rages aren’t frequent anymore. Each year, as the events of my youth recede further and further, my current life carries more emotional significance than that long-ago era. I bounce out of bed every day, thrilled to greet the sunrise. I live my life with great gusto. I tell people that I can look back at each stage of my life with no regrets because, win or lose, I throw my best self at everything I try. I walk down the street as though I own it. All the while, the trauma has lodged in an obscure corner of my soul. I refuse to believe it’s a lifelong imprint, yet, with age 70 in clear view, I admit to wondering whether I will ever entirely heal that young girl who was pinned down.

Tell your story. Let us never again be silenced.


November 10, 2017




Democrats Actually Tried This Time. They Need to Keep It Up.

Three takeaways from a very good election for Democrats.







MICHAEL TOMASKY, DAILY BEAST

November 1, 2017





Russian content on Facebook, Google and Twitter reached far more users than companies first disclosed, congressional testimony says.


Facebook plans to tell lawmakers on Tuesday that 126 million of its users may have seen content produced and circulated by Russian operatives, many times more than the company had previously disclosed about the reach of the online influence campaign targeting American voters.
The company previously reported that an estimated 10 million users had seen ads bought by Russian-controlled accounts and pages. But Facebook has been silent regarding the spread of free content despite independent researchers suggesting that it was seen by far more users than the ads were.


New York attack: Truck mounts cycle path near Ground Zero
Eight people are dead and 11 have been injured after a truck mounted a bicycle path in lower Manhattan on Tuesday afternoon, mowing down cyclists and runners while shouting 'Allahu Akbar'. The 29-year-old driver, named by insiders as Sayfullo Saipov (pictured left, seen center after incident), mounted the bicycle path at Houston Street at 3.05pm and drove 17 blocks downtown, knocking down victims before coming to a stop at Chambers Street where he eventually crashed his truck into a school bus. After coming to a stop in his rented Home Depot truck (bottom-right), the terrorist then emerged, waving a paintball gun in one hand and a pellet gun in the other. He was shot in the stomach by an on-duty NYPD officer who was at the scene and the suspect is now in hospital under police supervision. At a press conference at Police Plaza later, New York Mayor Bill De Blasio condemned the attack as a 'cowardly act of terror'. Saipov was reported to be an Uzbekistan native who had lived in the US for seven years. He was truck drver and a 'friendly' Uber driver. And although he was reportedly found with a Florida ID when arrested, he had lived most recently in New Jersey.  and ran two trucking companies located in Ohio. Notes indicating loyalty to ISIS were near his truck.

Saipov had earned a green card, according to a law enforcement official who spoke under the condition of anonymity. He arrived in the United States in 2010 in Ohio. At some point, Mr. Saipov made his way to Fort Myers, Fla., where he met a fellow Uzbek immigrant, Kobiljon Matkarov. Mr. Saipov was working as a truck driver at the time.

Neighbors were located  in Tampa, Florida who say Saipov lived with a young family in a modest apartment complex with a woman and two or three children, as well as an older woman took to be Saipov’s or the woman’s mother. The family told Eagan they used to live in New York and Ohio before moving to Florida. But the neighbors said the family moved out over the summer. They said Saipov told her they were moving to New Jersey because Saipov's job got transferred. 

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said “there is no evidence to suggest a wider plot or a wider scheme.” One reason these "lone wolf" vehicle attacks have become so popular is that they're hard to predict and prevent. They aren't designed to cripple a country — just terrorize the populace. [Vox / Zack Beauchamp].

Almost immediately, as investigators began to look into Mr. Saipov’s history, it became clear that he had been on the radar of federal authorities. Three officials said he had come to the federal authorities’ attention as a result of an unrelated investigation, but it was not clear whether that was because he was a friend, an associate or a family member of someone under scrutiny or because he himself had been the focus of an investigation. Martin Feely, a spokesman for the New York F.B.I. office, declined to comment on whether Mr. Saipov was known to the bureau. Saipov became influenced by the Islamic State and its violent tactics after arriving in this country from Uzbekistan, officials said.


Mr. Saipov, a slim, bearded man, was seen in videos running through traffic after the attack with a paintball gun in one hand and a pellet gun in the other. Six people died at the scene and two others died at a hospital, officials said. The authorities credited the officer who shot him with saving lives.
NYPD officer Ryan Nash (above), 28, is being credited with stopping the attack from becoming worse by shooting Saipov
NYPD officer Ryan Nash (above), 28, is being credited with stopping the attack from becoming worse by shooting Saipov. Nash joined the NYPD in July 2012 and is a Long Island resident, police sources told the Daily News. He was commended by NYPD Commissioner James O'Neil for his efforts. Officer Nash is assigned to Lower Manhattan's 1st Precinct and arrived to the scene after responding to a call of a nonviolent, emotionally disturbed person outside Stuyvesant High School, the New York Daily News reported.  

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5037279/Truck-driver-terror-attack-Uzbek-national-aged-29.html#ixzz4xA3FQrPi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


“He was Johnny-on-the-spot and he takes the guy down,” a city official said.

Mr. Saipov wove a deadly path on a stretch usually bustling with commuters, runners and cyclists, drawn by the downtown offices nearby or the shimmering river.
He turned onto the bike path alongside the West Side Highway at Houston Street just after 3 p.m. and sped south, striking numerous pedestrians and cyclists, many of them in the back, the authorities said. People scattered and dived to the asphalt.
The truck came to a stop by crashing into a school bus after plowing through others on the bike path. The two adults and two children inside the bus were injured
The truck came to a stop by crashing into a school bus after plowing through others on the bike path. The two adults and two children inside the bus were injured.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5037279/Truck-driver-terror-attack-Uzbek-national-aged-29.html#ixzz4xA3ra19N
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

October 31, 2017

House arrest for indicted former Trump campaign officials

  



Robert Mueller’s Message to Paul Manafort: Cooperate Now or You’ll Regret It


“He could have kept running campaigns for the Yanukovychs of the world, and nobody would have cared,” one associate said.



Manafort used 'laundered' cash to live 'lavish lifestyle'


This is the way you kick off a big case,” a lawyer said after the one-two punch delivered Monday by the special counsel.

George Papadopoulos, a former campaign adviser to Donald Trump.

NY TIMES

Months Before News of Email Hack, Trump Aide Knew

Trump Campaign Got Early Word Russia Had Democrats’ Emails


The guilty plea of a 30-year-old campaign aide — so green that he listed Model United Nations in his qualifications — shifted the narrative on Monday of the Trump campaign’s interactions with Russia: Court documents revealed that Russian officials alerted the campaign, through an intermediary in April 2016, that they possessed thousands of Democratic emails and other “dirt” on Hillary Clinton.
That was two months before the Russian hacking of the Democratic National Committee was publicly revealed and the stolen emails began to appear online. The new court filings provided the first clear evidence that Trump campaign aides had early knowledge that Russia had stolen confidential documents on Mrs. Clinton and the committee, a tempting trove in a close presidential contest.
By the time of a crucial meeting in June of last year, when Donald Trump Jr. and other senior Trump campaign officials met with a Russian lawyer offering damaging information on Mrs. Clinton, some may have known for weeks that Russia had material likely obtained by illegal hacking, the new documents suggested. The disclosures added to the evidence pointing to attempts at collaboration between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, but they appeared to fall short of proof that they conspired in the hacking or other illegal acts.
The improbable figure at the center of the new information was a “foreign policy adviser” to Mr. Trump, George Papadopoulos. It was Mr. Papadopoulos, one of three men whose charges were announced on Monday, who appears to have been the first campaign aide to learn about the Russian hacking of Democratic targets.
A crucial detail is still missing: Whether and when Mr. Papadopoulos told senior Trump campaign officials about Russia’s possession of hacked emails. And it appears that the young aide’s quest for a deeper connection with Russian officials, while he aggressively pursued it, led nowhere.
Mr. Papadopoulos repeatedly promoted the idea of a “history making” meeting between Mr. Trump and Vladimir V. Putin, the Russian president. Senior campaign officials, however, said that Mr. Trump should not make the trip and leave it to someone “low level in the campaign so as not to send any signal,’’ according to an email cited in court documents.
Mr. Papadopoulos then proposed that he himself, perhaps with another campaign official, travel to Moscow to meet with the Russians.
“The trip proposed by defendant PAPADOPOULOS did not take place,” prosecutors wrote.
To grasp the significance of Monday’s developments, it helps to recall exactly how the Russian attack unfolded.
In September 2015, the F.B.I. made its first call to the Democratic National Committee to report evidence of Russian hackers inside the committee’s network. But for seven months, the word never got beyond an I.T. contractor, and the hackers apparently had the run of confidential emails and other files.
During that time, Mr. Trump was pressed to assemble a team of foreign policy advisers, a difficult task because he was shunned by many Republicans who had served in earlier administrations. In early March, Mr. Papadopoulos, who had been helping the beleaguered campaign of Dr. Ben Carson, offered his services to the Trump campaign.

Image result for former Trump adviser as Sam Clovis
A former senior adviser on President Donald Trump’s campaign team, Sam Clovis, sought to distance himself on Tuesday from George Papadopoulos,
Around March 6, documents say, a campaign supervisor – identified by a former Trump adviser as Sam Clovis – told Mr. Papadopoulos, then living in London, that “a principal foreign policy focus of the campaign was an improved relationship with Russia.”

Joseph Mifsud, right, with Alexander Yakovenko, the Russian ambassador to the UK, in a photo from 2014. The pair apparently discussed an academic summit in Moscow that Mifsud had attended. Photograph: Russian embassy
A week later, traveling in Italy, Mr. Papadopoulos encountered a London-based professor of international relations, Joseph Mifsud, who claimed to have “substantial connections with Russian government officials.” (The court documents do not name Mr. Mifsud, but a Senate aide briefed on the case identified him as the professor in question.)
Unimpressed by Mr. Papadopoulos at first, Mr. Mifsud became far more interested when he learned that the young traveler was working for the Trump campaign. The two men met again in London on March 24, when the professor introduced Mr. Papadopoulos to a Russian woman he said was a relative of Mr. Putin with close ties to senior Russian officials.
The same week, Mr. Trump, visiting The Washington Post, was pressed to name his foreign policy team. He read out five names, most of them with modest or nonexistent public profiles – including Mr. Papadopoulos. Mr. Papadopoulos began emailing campaign officials about his new contacts with his “good friend” Mr. Mifsud and the Russian woman, whom he incorrectly believed was Mr. Putin’s niece, and the possablity of a Trump-Putin meeting.
On March 31, back in Washington, Mr. Papadopoulos met Mr. Trump for the first time at a gathering of his new foreign policy team at the candidate’s Washington hotel. According to the former Trump adviser who was there, and who spoke on condition of anonymity to avoid offending former colleagues, Mr. Papadopoulos spoke for a few minutes about his Russian contacts and the prospects for a meeting with the Russian president.
But several people in the room began to raise questions about the wisdom of a meeting with Mr. Putin, noting that Russia was under sanctions from the United States. Jeff Sessions, now attorney general and then a senator from Alabama who was counseling Mr. Trump on national security, “shut George down,” the adviser said. “He said, ‘We’re not going to do it’ and he added, ‘I’d prefer that nobody speak about this again.’”
But Mr. Papadopoulos was not deterred, the documents say, and he continued to communicate with Mr. Mifsud and the Russian woman about more contacts. The Russian woman wrote on April 11, “we are all very excited by the possibility of a good relationship with Mr. Trump.” Mr. Mifsud introduced Mr. Papadopoulos over email to a Moscow contact who said he had connections to the Russian foreign ministry. They spoke repeatedly over Skype about a possible Moscow trip, the documents say.
On April 26 came a crucial meeting. At breakfast at a London hotel, Mr. Mifsud told Mr. Papadopoulos that he had just returned from Moscow, where he had “learned that the Russians had obtained ‘dirt’ on then-candidate Clinton.” Mr. Mifsud said he had been told the Russians had “thousands of emails.”
On May 4, the Russian contact with ties to the foreign ministry wrote to Mr. Papadopoulos and Mr. Mifsud, saying ministry officials were “open for cooperation.” Mr. Papadopoulos forwarded the message to a senior campaign official, asking whether the contacts were “something we want to move forward with.”

A 2016 tweet from Donald Trump shows George Papadopoulos, third from left. (Twitter)
The court documents describe in detail how Mr. Papadopoulos continued to report to senior campaign officials on his efforts to arrange meetings with Russian officials, which The Washington Post reported on in August. But the documents do not say explicitly whether, and to whom, he passed on his most explosive discovery – that the Russians had what they considered compromising emails on Mr. Trump’s opponent.
Prosecutors may have deliberately left salient details out of the documents filed in court to protect the continuing investigation. But what they did say portrays Mr. Papadopoulos as continuing for months to arrange meetings with Russian officials. As late as August 2016, Mr. Papadopoulos was advised by a campaign official, apparently Mr. Clovis, to travel to Moscow “if it is feasible.”